Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27548729›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical gastroenterology2017

Use of Wireless Capsule Endoscopy for the Diagnosis and Grading of Esophageal Varices in Patients With Portal Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Thomas R McCarty, Yuliya Afinogenova, Basile Njei

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Endoscope Capsules: The Present Situation and Future Outlooks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Diagnosis and Management of Esophagogastric Varices.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Video Capsule Endoscopy in Gastroenterology.Gastroenterology research · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Miniature gastrointestinal endoscopy: Now and the future.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  20. Update on the management of gastrointestinal varices.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas R McCarty*Department of Internal Medicine †Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine ‡Investigative Medicine Program, Yale Center of Clinical Investigation, New Haven, CT.
Yuliya Afinogenova
Basile Njei
Yale University · US

Funding

Training Program in Investigative HepatologyT32DK007356 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL H NATHANSON · 1986 to 2026
$7.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEsophageal variceal bleeding is a severe complication of portal hypertension with significant morbidity and mortality. Although traditional screening and grading of esophageal varices has been performed by endogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), wireless video capsule endoscopy provides a minimally invasive alternative that may improve screening and surveillance compliance. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review and structured meta-analysis of all eligible studies to evaluate the efficacy of wireless capsule endoscopy for screening and diagnosis of esophageal varices among patients with portal hypertension.

methodsSearches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were performed through December 2015. Bivariate and hierarchical models were used to compute the pooled sensitivity and specificity, and to plot the summary receiver operating characteristics curve with summary point and corresponding 95% confidence region. Bias of included studies was assessed using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2.

resultsSeventeen studies from 2005 to 2015 were included in this meta-analysis (n=1328). The diagnostic accuracy of wireless capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal varices was 90% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88-0.93]. The diagnostic pooled sensitivity and specificity were 83% (95% CI, 0.76-0.89) and 85% (95% CI, 0.75-0.91), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of wireless capsule endoscopy for the grading of medium to large varices was 92% (95% CI, 0.90-0.94). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 72% (95% CI, 0.54-0.85) and 91% (95% CI, 0.86-0.94), respectively, for the grading of medium to large varices. The use of capsule demonstrated only mild adverse events. A sensitivity analysis limited to only high quality studies revealed similar results. DISCUSSION: Wireless esophageal capsule endoscopy is well tolerated and safe in patients with liver cirrhosis and suspicion of portal hypertension. The sensitivity of capsule endoscopy is not currently sufficient to replace EGD as a first exploration in these patients, but given its high accuracy, it may have a role in cases of refusal or contraindication to EGD.

Indexed as

Capsule EndoscopyEsophageal and Gastric VaricesEsophagusGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansHypertension, PortalSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID27548729
PMCPMC5218864
OpenAlexW2517056752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.