Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27548681›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Acquisition of Conditioning between Methamphetamine and Cues in Healthy Humans.

Joel S Cavallo, Leah M Mayo, Harriet de Wit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Scoping Review on Cue Reactivity in Methamphetamine Use Disorder.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  2. Neural responses to cues paired with methamphetamine in healthy volunteers.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joel S CavalloDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC3077, Chicago, IL 60637, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0526-5713
Leah M MayoCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linkӧping University, SE 58183, Linkӧping, Sweden.
Harriet de WitDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC3077, Chicago, IL 60637, United States of America.

Funding

Acquisition and persistence of drug cue conditioning in humans - Resubmission 01R01DA037011 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental stimuli repeatedly paired with drugs of abuse can elicit conditioned responses that are thought to promote future drug seeking. We recently showed that healthy volunteers acquired conditioned responses to auditory and visual stimuli after just two pairings with methamphetamine (MA, 20 mg, oral). This study extended these findings by systematically varying the number of drug-stimuli pairings. We expected that more pairings would result in stronger conditioning. Three groups of healthy adults were randomly assigned to receive 1, 2 or 4 pairings (Groups P1, P2 and P4, Ns = 13, 16, 16, respectively) of an auditory-visual stimulus with MA, and another stimulus with placebo (PBO). Drug-cue pairings were administered in an alternating, counterbalanced order, under double-blind conditions, during 4 hr sessions. MA produced prototypic subjective effects (mood, ratings of drug effects) and alterations in physiology (heart rate, blood pressure). Although subjects did not exhibit increased behavioral preference for, or emotional reactivity to, the MA-paired cue after conditioning, they did exhibit an increase in attentional bias (initial gaze) toward the drug-paired stimulus. Further, subjects who had four pairings reported "liking" the MA-paired cue more than the PBO cue after conditioning. Thus, the number of drug-stimulus pairings, varying from one to four, had only modest effects on the strength of conditioned responses. Further studies investigating the parameters under which drug conditioning occurs will help to identify risk factors for developing drug abuse, and provide new treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalAcoustic StimulationAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAffectAttentional BiasBlood PressureCuesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMethamphetaminePhotic StimulationMethamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID27548681
PMCPMC4993385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.