Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27548678›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2016

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices regarding Diarrhea and Cholera following an Oral Cholera Vaccination Campaign in the Solomon Islands.

Eleanor Burnett, Tenneth Dalipanda, Divi Ogaoga, Jenny Gaiofa, Gregory Jilini, Alison Halpin, Vance Dietz, Kashmira Date, Eric Mintz, Terri Hyde and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Household Water Treatment and Cholera Control.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eleanor BurnettCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Tenneth DalipandaMinistry of Health and Medical Services, Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Divi OgaogaMinistry of Health and Medical Services, Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Jenny GaiofaMinistry of Health and Medical Services, Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Gregory JiliniGizo Hospital, Gizo, Solomon Islands.
Alison HalpinCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Vance DietzCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Kashmira DateCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Eric MintzCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Terri HydeCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Kathleen WannemuehlerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Catherine YenCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to a 2011 cholera outbreak in Papua New Guinea, the Government of the Solomon Islands initiated a cholera prevention program which included cholera disease prevention and treatment messaging, community meetings, and a pre-emptive cholera vaccination campaign targeting 11,000 children aged 1-15 years in selected communities in Choiseul and Western Provinces. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL

findingsWe conducted a post-vaccination campaign, household-level survey about knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding diarrhea and cholera in areas targeted and not targeted for cholera vaccination. Respondents in vaccinated areas were more likely to have received cholera education in the previous 6 months (33% v. 9%; p = 0.04), to know signs and symptoms (64% vs. 22%; p = 0.02) and treatment (96% vs. 50%; p = 0.02) of cholera, and to be aware of cholera vaccine (48% vs. 14%; p = 0.02). There were no differences in water, sanitation, and hygiene practices.

conclusionsThis pre-emptive OCV campaign in a cholera-naïve community provided a unique opportunity to assess household-level knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding diarrhea, cholera, and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH). Our findings suggest that education provided during the vaccination campaign may have reinforced earlier mass messaging about cholera and diarrheal disease in vaccinated communities.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeImmunization ProgramsAdministration, OralAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCholeraCholera VaccinesDiarrheaDisease OutbreaksFemaleHumansHygieneInfantMaleMass VaccinationCholera Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID27548678
PMCPMC4993445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.