Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27548287›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Association of Empirically Derived Dietary Patterns with Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Comparison of PCA and RRR Methods.

Nicolas Sauvageot, Sonia Leite, Ala'a Alkerwi, Leila Sisanni, Faiez Zannad, Stranges Saverio, Anne-Françoise Donneau, Adelin Albert, Michèle Guillaume

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolas SauvageotLuxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Strassen, Luxembourg.
Sonia LeiteLuxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Strassen, Luxembourg.
Ala'a AlkerwiLuxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Strassen, Luxembourg.
Leila SisanniAPHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Faiez ZannadHypertension Unit, Département des maladies cardiovasculaires, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Stranges SaverioLuxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), Strassen, Luxembourg.
Anne-Françoise DonneauEcole de Santé Publique, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Adelin AlbertEcole de Santé Publique, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Michèle GuillaumeEcole de Santé Publique, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Luxembourg Institute of Health · LUUniversity of Liège · BECentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrincipal component analysis is used to determine dietary behaviors of a population whereas reduced rank regression is used to construct disease-related dietary patterns. This study aimed to compare both types of DP and theirs associations with cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF). MATERIEL AND

methodsData were derived from the cross sectional NESCAV (Nutrition, Environment and Cardiovascular Health) study, aiming to describe the cardiovascular health of the Greater region's population (Grand duchy of Luxembourg, Wallonia (Belgium), Lorraine (France)). 2298 individuals were included for this study and dietary intake was assessed using a 134-item food frequency questionnaire.

resultsWe found that CVRF-related patterns also reflect eating behaviours of the population. Comparing concordant food groups between both dietary pattern methods, a diet high in fruits, oleaginous and dried fruits, vegetables, olive oil, fats rich in omega 6 and tea and low in fried foods, lean and fatty meat, processed meat, ready meal, soft drink and beer was associated with lower prevalence of CVRF. In the opposite, a pattern characterized by high intakes of fried foods, meat, offal, beer, wine and aperitifs and spirits, and low intakes of cereals, sugar and sweets and soft drinks was associated with higher prevalence of CVRF.

conclusionIn sum, we found that a "Prudent" and "Animal protein and alcohol" patterns were both associated with CVRF and behaviourally meaningful. Moreover, the relationships of those dietary patterns with lifestyle characteristics support the theory that food choices are part of a larger pattern of healthy lifestyle.

Indexed as

AdultAlcohol DrinkingAnimalsBelgiumCarbonated BeveragesCardiovascular DiseasesDietEdible GrainEnergy IntakeFemaleFood PreferencesFranceFruitHumansLife StyleLuxembourg

Identifiers

PMID27548287
PMCPMC4993423
OpenAlexW2516283799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.