Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27548257›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Low CD4/CD8 Ratio Is Associated with Non AIDS-Defining Cancers in Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy: ANRS CO8 (Aproco/Copilote) Prospective Cohort Study.

Mariam Noelie Hema, Tristan Ferry, Michel Dupon, Lise Cuzin, Renaud Verdon, Rodolphe Thiébaut, Camelia Protopopescu, Catherine Leport, François Raffi, Vincent Le Moing and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CD4/CD8 Ratio and Cancer Risk Among Adults With HIV.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mariam Noelie HemaUMI 233 IRD/Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Tristan FerryHospices civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.
Michel DuponCHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Lise CuzinINSERM, UMR 1027, Toulouse, Université de Toulouse III, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Renaud VerdonCHU de Caen, EA 4655 Risques microbiens, Université de Caen, Caen, France.
Rodolphe ThiébautINSERM U897, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Camelia ProtopopescuINSERM UMR_S 912 (SESSTIM), Université Aix-Marseille, ORS PACA, Marseille, France.
Catherine LeportCMIT, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, Paris, France.
François RaffiInfectious Diseases Department, University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Vincent Le MoingUMI 233 IRD/Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
ANRS CO 8 (APROCO/COPILOTE) study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo study the association between CD4/CD8 ratio and morbidity in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART).

methodsThe APROCO/COPILOTE cohort enrolled patients initiating a protease inhibitor-containing ART in 1997-1999. The association between occurrence of first non AIDS-defining severe events (NADE) and time-dependent measures of immune restoration was assessed by 4 Cox models with different definitions of restoration, CD4+ cell counts (CD4), CD4/CD8 ratio, both CD4 and CD4/CD8 ratio, or a composite variable (CD4< 500/mm3, CD4 > 500/mm3 and CD4/CD8 ratio < 1, CD4 > 500/mm3 and CD4/CD8 ratio > 1). Models adjusted on baseline characteristics and time-dependent viral load were compared using Akaike Information Criterion.

resultsWe included 1227 patients. Median duration of follow-up was 9.2 years (IQR: 4.2-11.4). Median CD4 was 530/mm3 at 9 years. Median CD4/CD8 ratio was 0.3 (IQR: 0.2-0.5) at baseline and 0.6 (IQR: 0.4-0.9) after 9 years. Incidence of first NADE was 7.4/100 person-years, the most common being bacterial infections (21%), cardiovascular events (14%) and cancers (10%). For both bacterial infections and cardiovascular events, the CD4/CD8 ratio did not add predictive information to the CD4 cell count. However, low CD4/CD8 ratio was the best predictor of non-AIDS cancers (adjusted HR = 2.13 for CD4/CD8 < 0.5; 95% CI = 1.32-3.44).

conclusionsCD4/CD8 ratio remains < 1 in most HIV-infected patients despite long-term CD4+ cell counts restoration on ART. A CD4/CD8 ratio < 0.5 could identify patients who require a more intensive strategy of cancer prevention or screening.

Indexed as

CD4-CD8 RatioAdultAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveBacterial InfectionsBiomarkersCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleHIVHIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansMaleMyocardial InfarctionNeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkersHIV Protease Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID27548257
PMCPMC4993515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.