Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27548152›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

Accumulation and Toxicity of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Cells and Experimental Animals.

Greta Jarockyte, Egle Daugelaite, Marius Stasys, Urte Statkute, Vilius Poderys, Ting-Chen Tseng, Shan-Hui Hsu, Vitalijus Karabanovas, Ricardas Rotomskis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Magnetic Nanoparticles in Bone Tissue Engineering.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Greta JarockyteBiomedical Physics Laboratory of National Cancer Institute, Baublio 3B, LT08406 Vilnius, Lithuania. greta.jarockyte@nvi.lt.
Egle DaugelaiteBiomedical Physics Laboratory of National Cancer Institute, Baublio 3B, LT08406 Vilnius, Lithuania. e.daugelaite@gmail.com.
Marius StasysBiomedical Physics Laboratory of National Cancer Institute, Baublio 3B, LT08406 Vilnius, Lithuania. marius.stalnionis@nvi.lt.
Urte StatkuteBiomedical Physics Laboratory of National Cancer Institute, Baublio 3B, LT08406 Vilnius, Lithuania. urtestatkute@gmail.com.
Vilius PoderysBiomedical Physics Laboratory of National Cancer Institute, Baublio 3B, LT08406 Vilnius, Lithuania. vilius.poderys@nvi.lt.
Ting-Chen TsengInstitute of Polymer Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Roosevelt Road Sec. 4, Taipei 10617, Taiwan. bbam1986@hotmail.com.
Shan-Hui HsuInstitute of Polymer Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Roosevelt Road Sec. 4, Taipei 10617, Taiwan. shhsu@ntu.edu.tw.
Vitalijus KarabanovasBiomedical Physics Laboratory of National Cancer Institute, Baublio 3B, LT08406 Vilnius, Lithuania. vitaliljus.karabanovas@vgtu.lt.
Ricardas RotomskisBiomedical Physics Laboratory of National Cancer Institute, Baublio 3B, LT08406 Vilnius, Lithuania. ricardas.rotomskis@nvi.lt.
National Cancer Institute · LTNational Taiwan University · TWVilnius Gediminas Technical University · LTVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The uptake and distribution of negatively charged superparamagnetic iron oxide (Fe₃O₄) nanoparticles (SPIONs) in mouse embryonic fibroblasts NIH3T3, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal influenced by SPIONs injected into experimental animals, were visualized and investigated. Cellular uptake and distribution of the SPIONs in NIH3T3 after staining with Prussian Blue were investigated by a bright-field microscope equipped with digital color camera. SPIONs were localized in vesicles, mostly placed near the nucleus. Toxicity of SPION nanoparticles tested with cell viability assay (XTT) was estimated. The viability of NIH3T3 cells remains approximately 95% within 3-24 h of incubation, and only a slight decrease of viability was observed after 48 h of incubation. MRI studies on Wistar rats using a clinical 1.5 T MRI scanner were showing that SPIONs give a negative contrast in the MRI. The dynamic MRI measurements of the SPION clearance from the injection site shows that SPIONs slowly disappear from injection sites and only a low concentration of nanoparticles was completely eliminated within three weeks. No functionalized SPIONs accumulate in cells by endocytic mechanism, none accumulate in the nucleus, and none are toxic at a desirable concentration. Therefore, they could be used as a dual imaging agent: as contrast agents for MRI and for traditional optical biopsy by using Prussian Blue staining.

Indexed as

AnimalsContrast MediaFerric CompoundsInjections, IntramuscularMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetal NanoparticlesMiceMicroscopy, Atomic ForceNIH 3T3 CellsRatsRats, WistarContrast MediaFerric Compoundsferric oxidecellular uptakeiron oxidemagnetic nanoparticlesMRI-optical dual imagingmultifunctional cancer diagnosticsoptical biopsy of tissues cellsSPIONs

Identifiers

PMID27548152
PMCPMC5000591
OpenAlexW2510556729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.