Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27548031›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2016

Replicating and extending a model of effects of universal preventive intervention during early adolescence on young adult substance misuse.

Richard Spoth, Linda Trudeau, Cleve Redmond, Chungyeol Shin

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Family-based prevention programmes for alcohol use in young people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard SpothPartnerships in Prevention Science Institute.
Linda TrudeauPartnerships in Prevention Science Institute.
Cleve RedmondPartnerships in Prevention Science Institute.
Chungyeol ShinPartnerships in Prevention Science Institute.
Partnership for Prevention · US

Funding

RURAL YOUTH AND FAMILY COMPETENCIES BUILDING PROJECTR37DA010815 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 1997 to 2006
$8.0M
RURAL YOUTH AND FAMILY COMPETENCIES BUILDING PROJECTSR01DA010815 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 1999 to 2013
$3.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA010815NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA010815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis brief report summarizes a replication and extension of a developmental outcome modeling study, by examining whether delayed substance initiation during adolescence, resulting from universal middle school preventive interventions, reduces problematic use in young adults Ages 25 and 27, up to 14.5 years after baseline.

methodParticipants were middle school students from 36 Iowa schools randomly assigned to the Strengthening Families Program plus Life Skills Training (SFP 10-14 + LST), LST-only, or a control condition. Self-report questionnaires originally were collected at 11 time points, through Age 22. A subsequent grant allowed for assessments at Ages 25 and 27, including measures of drunkenness, alcohol-related problems, cigarette use, illicit drug use (lifetime and frequency), marijuana use and prescription drug misuse. These outcomes were modeled as variables influenced by growth factors describing substance initiation during adolescence. Models included the effects of baseline risk, intervention condition assignment, and their interaction; risk-related moderation effects were examined and relative reduction rates were calculated for dichotomous variables.

resultsModel fits were good. Analyses showed significant or marginally significant indirect intervention effects on all outcomes, through effects on adolescent substance initiation growth factors. Intervention × Risk interaction effects favored the higher risk subsample, replicating earlier findings. Additional direct effects on young adult use were observed only for cigarette frequency. Relative reduction rates were larger for the higher risk subsamples, ranging from 3.9% to 36.2%.

conclusionsUniversal preventive interventions implemented during early adolescence have the potential to decrease the rates of substance misuse and associated problems into young adulthood. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Family TherapyHealth EducationIllicit DrugsSchool Health ServicesAdolescentAdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic IntoxicationCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansIowaMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareSelf ReportSmoking PreventionIllicit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID27548031
PMCPMC5036990
OpenAlexW2514826759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.