Trial reportAnnals of internal medicine2016
Effect of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Recurrence in Multiply Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Trial.
Trial report in Annals of internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01703494 (Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Relapsing Clostridium Difficile Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 319 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Relapsing Clostridium Difficile Infection
Who cites it
319 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 600 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness of treatments for recurrentFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Fecal microbiota transplantation as a therapy for treating ulcerative colitis: an overview of systematic reviews.BMC microbiology · 2023Pooled it
- Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile (Clostridium difficile).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Geographical separation and ethnic origin influence the human gut microbial composition: a meta-analysis from a Malaysian perspective.Microbial genomics · 2021Pooled it
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) with Colonoscopy Is Superior to Enema and Nasogastric Tube While Comparable to Capsule for the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Pooled it
- Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: An official clinical practice guideline of the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy (SEQ), Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) and the working group of Postoperative Infection of the Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Reanimation (SEDAR).Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2020Guideline
- Fecal microbiota transplantation for the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A randomized controlled trial.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Trial
- Trial
- SER-109, an Investigational Microbiome Drug to Reduce Recurrence After Clostridioides difficile Infection: Lessons Learned From a Phase 2 Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Trial
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation BeyondJournal of Korean medical science · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy restores therapeutic efficacy of fecal microbiome transplants to treatbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Efficacy Outcomes of Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm in Preventing Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection from Seven Clinical Studies.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- Hierarchical Multi-Omics Trajectory Prediction for fecal microbiota transplantation: a novel machine learning framework for small-sample longitudinal multi-omics integration.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Narrative review on microbiota and sepsis: the host's betrayal?Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Gut Microbiome Recovery inDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in 2025: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
- Fecal microbiota and microbial community transplantation:Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Fecal microbiota transplantation: from empirical remedy to precision medicine.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2026Review
- Gut microecology in critical illness: mechanisms, biomarkers, and therapeutic strategies - a critical appraisal.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
259 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo date, evidence for the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been limited to case series and open-label clinical trials.
objectiveTo determine the efficacy and safety of FMT for treatment of recurrent CDI.
designRandomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01703494).
settingTwo academic medical centers. PATIENTS: 46 patients who had 3 or more recurrences of CDI and received a full course of vancomycin for their most recent acute episode.
interventionFecal microbiota transplantation with donor stool (heterologous) or patient's own stool (autologous) administered by colonoscopy. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was resolution of diarrhea without the need for further anti-CDI therapy during the 8-week follow-up. Safety data were compared between treatment groups via review of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and new medical conditions for 6 months after FMT. Fecal microbiota analyses were performed on patients' stool before and after FMT and also on donors' stool.
resultsIn the intention-to-treat analysis, 20 of 22 patients (90.9%) in the donor FMT group achieved clinical cure compared with 15 of 24 (62.5%) in the autologous FMT group (P = 0.042). Resolution after autologous FMT differed by site (9 of 10 vs. 6 of 14 [P = 0.033]). All 9 patients who developed recurrent CDI after autologous FMT were free of further CDI after subsequent donor FMT. There were no SAEs related to FMT. Donor FMT restored gut bacterial community diversity and composition to resemble that of healthy donors. LIMITATION: The study included only patients who had 3 or more recurrences and excluded those who were immunocompromised and aged 75 years or older.
conclusionDonor stool administered via colonoscopy seemed safe and was more efficacious than autologous FMT in preventing further CDI episodes. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.