Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27547758›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2016

Iontophoresis-Assisted Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking with Epithelial Debridement: Preliminary Results.

Paolo Vinciguerra, Vito Romano, Pietro Rosetta, Emanuela F Legrottaglie, Magdalena Kubrak-Kisza, Claudio Azzolini, Riccardo Vinciguerra

Abstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Enhancing Rose Bengal penetration inTherapeutic delivery · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Gene Therapy in the Anterior Eye Segment.Current gene therapy · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL).Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paolo VinciguerraHumanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; Humanitas University, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3864-8246
Vito RomanoDepartment of Corneal and External Eye Diseases, St. Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5148-7643
Pietro RosettaHumanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8491-6574
Emanuela F LegrottaglieHumanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy.
Magdalena Kubrak-KiszaDepartment and Clinic of Ophthalmology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6851-5527
Claudio AzzoliniDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Division of Ophthalmology, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1334-0974
Riccardo VinciguerraDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Division of Ophthalmology, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy; Department of Ophthalmology, Humanitas Mater Domini, Via Gerenzano 2, 21053 Castellanza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2280-9981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose. To report the early outcomes of iontophoresis-assisted corneal collagen cross-linking procedure with epithelial debridement (I-SCXL). Methods. Twenty eyes of twenty patients with progressive keratoconus were included in this prospective clinical study. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), sphere and cylinder refraction, corneal topography, Scheimpflug tomography, aberrometry, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and endothelial cell count were assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up. The parameters considered to establish keratoconus progression were always proven with differential maps as change in curvature in the cone area of at least 1 diopter obtained with an instantaneous map. Results. Functional parameters showed a significant improvement (p < 0.05) of BSCVA after 3 and 6 months of follow-up. Morphological parameters indicated stabilization of the corneal ectasia during the follow-up; however, a positive trend was noted with a mean flattening of 1.73 D. Minimum pachymetry values showed thinning that remained constant after the treatment. The demarcation line was clearly visible in all patients, reaching a depth of 308.2 ± 37.74 μm. None of the patients had continuous progression of keratoconus or had to repeat cross-linking procedures. Endothelial cell counts did not change significantly (p > 0.05). Conclusion. The early results indicate that the I-SCXL may be able to reduce the treatment time and improve the riboflavin diffusion.

Indexed as

KeratoconusAdultCorneaEndothelial CellsFemaleHumansIontophoresisMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesVision TestsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27547758
PMCPMC4980498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.