ReviewCurrent stem cell reports
Adult Versus Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: The Need for More Precise Nomenclature.
Review in Current stem cell reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Bridging the Gaps in Hematologic Disease Therapy.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Hyaluronan in mesenchymal stromal cell lineage differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells: application in serum free culture.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Article
- Letter to the Editor: Stem Cells Combined With Platelet-rich Plasma Effectively Treat Corticosteroid-induced Osteonecrosis of the Hip: A Prospective Study.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2018Article
- Complement C5a induces mesenchymal stem cell apoptosis during the progression of chronic diabetic complications.Diabetologia · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complexity of human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) fate represents both opportunity and challenge. In theory, all somatic cell types can be differentiated from hPSCs, opening the door to many opportunities in transplant medicine. However, such clinical applications require high standards of purity and identity, that challenge many existing protocols. This underscores the need for increasing precision in the description of cell identity during hPSC differentiation. We highlight one salient example, namely, the numerous published reports of hPSC-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). We suggest that many of these reports likely represent an improper use of certain cluster of differentiation (CD) antigens in defining bone marrow-derived MSCs. Instead, most such hPSC-derived mesenchymal cells are likely a complex mixture of embryonic anlagen, primarily of diverse mesodermal and neural crest origins, making precise identification, reproducible manufacture, and uniform differentiation difficult to achieve. We describe a potential path forward that may provide more precision in nomenclature, and cells with higher purity and identity for potential therapeutic use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.