Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27547680›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2016

Validity and reliability of Arabic MOS social support survey.

Mohamed Dafaalla, Abdulraheem Farah, Sheima Bashir, Ammar Khalil, Rabab Abdulhamid, Mousab Mokhtar, Mohamed Mahadi, Zulfa Omer, Asgad Suliman, Mohammed Elkhalifa and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Quality of couple relationship and associated factors in parents of NICU-cared infants during the first year after birth.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Social support in parents of children with neurodevelopmental disorders.International journal of developmental disabilities · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mohamed DafaallaSoba Centre for Audit and Research (SCAR), Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Alqasr Street, 102, PO Box 321, 11115 Khartoum, Sudan.
Abdulraheem FarahSoba Centre for Audit and Research (SCAR), Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Alqasr Street, 102, PO Box 321, 11115 Khartoum, Sudan.
Sheima BashirSoba Centre for Audit and Research (SCAR), Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Alqasr Street, 102, PO Box 321, 11115 Khartoum, Sudan.
Ammar KhalilSoba Centre for Audit and Research (SCAR), Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Alqasr Street, 102, PO Box 321, 11115 Khartoum, Sudan.
Rabab AbdulhamidSoba Centre for Audit and Research (SCAR), Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Alqasr Street, 102, PO Box 321, 11115 Khartoum, Sudan.
Mousab MokhtarSoba Centre for Audit and Research (SCAR), Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Alqasr Street, 102, PO Box 321, 11115 Khartoum, Sudan.
Mohamed MahadiSoba Centre for Audit and Research (SCAR), Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Alqasr Street, 102, PO Box 321, 11115 Khartoum, Sudan.
Zulfa OmerSoba Centre for Audit and Research (SCAR), Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Alqasr Street, 102, PO Box 321, 11115 Khartoum, Sudan.
Asgad SulimanSoba Centre for Audit and Research (SCAR), Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Alqasr Street, 102, PO Box 321, 11115 Khartoum, Sudan.
Mohammed ElkhalifaSoba Centre for Audit and Research (SCAR), Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Alqasr Street, 102, PO Box 321, 11115 Khartoum, Sudan.
Hanin AbdelgadirSoba Centre for Audit and Research (SCAR), Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Alqasr Street, 102, PO Box 321, 11115 Khartoum, Sudan.
Abdelmoneim E M KheirDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Ihab AbdalrahmanFaculty of Medicine, Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to generate a valid reliable Arabic version of MOS social support survey (MOS-SSS). We did a cross sectional study in medical students of Faculty of Medicine in Khartoum, Sudan. We did a clustered random sampling in 500 students of which 487 were suitable for analysis. We followed the standard translation process for translating the MOS-SSS. We accomplished factor analysis to assess construct validity, and generated item-scales correlations to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity. We extracted the Cronbach's α and Spearman Brown coefficient of spit half method to determine internal consistency. We measured stability by correlation between the scores of the MOS survey taken at two different occasions with ten days apart in 252 participants. All items correlated highly (0.788 or greater) with their hypothesized scales. All items in subscales correlated higher by two standard errors with their own scale than with any other scale. Principle component analysis with varimax rotation was conducted on the 19 items and examination of scree plot graphically suggested 4 predominant factors that account for 72 % of variance. It showed high loadings, ranging from 0.720 to 0.84 for items of emotional support, 0.699-0.845 for tangible support, 0.518-0.823 for affectionate support, and 0.740-0.816 for positive social interaction. Cronbach's alpha for overall MOS scale and subscales indicated high internal consistency. The test-retest correlation showed weak correlation between the test and retest (ranges from 0.04 to 0.104). The Arabic MOS-SSS had high validity and internal consistency.

Indexed as

Arabic MOS surveyPsychometric propertiesReliabilitySocial supportValidity

Identifiers

PMID27547680
PMCPMC4978659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.