Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27547567›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2016

Phage on tap-a quick and efficient protocol for the preparation of bacteriophage laboratory stocks.

Natasha Bonilla, Maria Isabel Rojas, Giuliano Netto Flores Cruz, Shr-Hau Hung, Forest Rohwer, Jeremy J Barr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 182 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
182citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

182 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bacteriophage vB_SalS_KY05 controlsThe veterinary quarterly · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Scarless one-tube genome assemblyRSC chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. mBio · 2026
    Article
  16. Phage cocktails containing a dual-receptorApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A LyticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  20. ThreeViruses · 2026
    Article

122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natasha BonillaDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Maria Isabel RojasDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Giuliano Netto Flores CruzDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Shr-Hau HungDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Forest RohwerDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Jeremy J BarrDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.

Funding

U of Calif, San Diego Neuroscience Microscopy ImagingP30NS047101 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GLEESON, JOSEPH G, ZHENG, BINHAI · 2003 to 2022
$9.0M
Ecology of Cystic Fibrosis: Administrative SupplementR01GM095384 · NIGMS · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROHWER, FOREST L · 2011 to 2014
$1.9M
Hydra as an Antiviral Innate Immunity Model SystemR21AI094534 · NIAID · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROHWER, FOREST L · 2011 to 2012
$411k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI094534NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095384NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS047101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major limitation with traditional phage preparations is the variability in titer, salts, and bacterial contaminants between successive propagations. Here we introduce the Phage On Tap (PoT) protocol for the quick and efficient preparation of homogenous bacteriophage (phage) stocks. This method produces homogenous, laboratory-scale, high titer (up to 10(10-11) PFU·ml(-1)), endotoxin reduced phage banks that can be used to eliminate the variability between phage propagations and improve the molecular characterizations of phage. The method consists of five major parts, including phage propagation, phage clean up by 0.22 μm filtering and chloroform treatment, phage concentration by ultrafiltration, endotoxin removal, and the preparation and storage of phage banks for continuous laboratory use. From a starting liquid lysate of > 100 mL, the PoT protocol generated a clean, homogenous, laboratory phage bank with a phage recovery efficiency of 85% within just two days. In contrast, the traditional method took upwards of five days to produce a high titer, but lower volume phage stock with a recovery efficiency of only 4%. Phage banks can be further purified for the removal of bacterial endotoxins, reducing endotoxin concentrations by over 3,000-fold while maintaining phage titer. The PoT protocol focused on T-like phages, but is broadly applicable to a variety of phages that can be propagated to sufficient titer, producing homogenous, high titer phage banks that are applicable for molecular and cellular assays.

Indexed as

BacteriophageCesium chlorideDialysisEndotoxinPhage bankSpeed vacuumTop agarUltrafiltration

Identifiers

PMID27547567
PMCPMC4975003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.