Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27547495›Full record

SynthesisBrain and behavior2016

Bone density and depressive disorder: a meta-analysis.

Julietta Ursula Schweiger, Ulrich Schweiger, Michael Hüppe, Kai G Kahl, Wiebke Greggersen, Eva Fassbinder

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Use of Antidepressive Agents and Bone Mineral Density in Women: A Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Depression and risk of fracture and bone loss: an updated meta-analysis of prospective studies.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julietta Ursula SchweigerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Lübeck University Medical School Lübeck Germany.
Ulrich SchweigerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Lübeck University Medical School Lübeck Germany.
Michael HüppeDepartment of Anesthesiology Lübeck University Medical School Lübeck Germany.
Kai G KahlDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany.
Wiebke GreggersenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Lübeck University Medical School Lübeck Germany.
Eva FassbinderDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Lübeck University Medical School Lübeck Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence of low bone mineral density (BMD) in depression. Low BMD is a major risk factor for osteoporotic fractures and frailty.

methodsThe searched database was Pubmed, Meta-analysis included human studies in men and women fulfilling the following criteria: (1) assessment of BMD in the lumbar spine, the femur or the total hip; (2) comparison of BMD between depressed individuals and the healthy control group; (3) measurement of BMD using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA); and (4) data on the mean, standard deviation, or standard error of BMD.

resultsTwenty-one studies were identified, encompassing 1842 depressed and 17,401 nondepressed individuals. Significant negative composite weighted mean effect sizes were identified for the lumbar spine (d = -0.15, 95%CL -0.22 to -0.08), femur (d = -0.34, 95%CL -0.64 to -0.05), and total hip (d = -0.14, 95%CL -0.23 to -0.05) indicating low BMD in depression. Examining men and women shows low bone density in the lumbar spine and femur in women and low bone density in the hip in men. The differences between men and women with MDD and the comparison group tended to be higher when examined by expert interviewers. Low bone density was found in all age groups.

conclusionsBone mineral density is reduced in patients with depressive disorders. The studies provide little evidence for potential relevant mediating factors.

Indexed as

Bone DensityAbsorptiometry, PhotonDepressive DisorderHumansAbsorptiometrybone densitydepressive disordermeta‐analysisosteoporosisphoton

Identifiers

PMID27547495
PMCPMC4980464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.