ReviewF1000Research2016
Intracellular targeting with engineered proteins.
Review in F1000Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic Effects of Polycationic and Polyfluorinated Functionalities for Efficient Intracellular Protein Delivery.Biomacromolecules · 2025Article
- A pan-KRAS degrader for the treatment of KRAS-mutant cancers.Cell discovery · 2024Article
- Review
- Intracellular Delivery of Functional Proteins with DNA-Protein Nanogels-Lipids Complex.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024Article
- Recognition and reprogramming of E3 ubiquitin ligase surfaces by α-helical peptides.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Intracellular delivery of therapeutic proteins. New advancements and future directions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Synthetic Proteins behind the Plasma Barrier: Molecular Spies.Accounts of chemical research · 2022Article
- Translocating Peptides of Biomedical Interest Obtained from the Spike (S) Glycoprotein of the SARS-CoV-2.Membranes · 2022Article
- Genetic and Covalent Protein Modification Strategies to Facilitate Intracellular Delivery.Biomacromolecules · 2021Review
- Evolution of KIPPIS as a versatile platform for evaluating intracellularly functional peptide aptamers.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Modeling Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Therapeutic Antibodies: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Transient Photoinactivation of Cell Membrane Protein Activity without Genetic Modification by Molecular Hyperthermia.ACS nano · 2019Article
- BRAIN Initiative: Cutting-Edge Tools and Resources for the Community.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Review
- Quantitation of Super Basic Peptides in Biological Matrices by a Generic Perfluoropentanoic Acid-Based Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Method.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019Article
- Inhibition of Marburg Virus RNA Synthesis by a Synthetic Anti-VP35 Antibody.ACS infectious diseases · 2019Article
- Modulating protein-protein interaction networks in protein homeostasis.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2019Review
- Trapped! A Critical Evaluation of Methods for Measuring Total Cellular Uptake versus Cytosolic Localization.Bioconjugate chemistry · 2019Review
- A review of lipidation in the development of advanced protein and peptide therapeutics.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019Review
- ER intrabody-mediated inhibition of interferon α secretion by mouse macrophages and dendritic cells.PloS one · 2019Article
- Targeted Intracellular Delivery of Antibodies: The State of the Art.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
If the isolation, production, and clinical use of insulin marked the inception of the age of biologics as therapeutics, the convergence of molecular biology and combinatorial engineering techniques marked its coming of age. The first wave of recombinant protein-based drugs in the 1980s demonstrated emphatically that proteins could be engineered, formulated, and employed for clinical advantage. Yet despite the successes of protein-based drugs such as antibodies, enzymes, and cytokines, the druggable target space for biologics is currently restricted to targets outside the cell. Insofar as estimates place the number of proteins either secreted or with extracellular domains in the range of 8000 to 9000, this represents only one-third of the proteome and circumscribes the pathways that can be targeted for therapeutic intervention. Clearly, a major objective for this field to reach maturity is to access, interrogate, and modulate the majority of proteins found inside the cell. However, owing to the large size, complex architecture, and general cellular impermeability of existing protein-based drugs, this poses a daunting challenge. In recent years, though, advances on the two related fronts of protein engineering and drug delivery are beginning to bring this goal within reach. First, prompted by the restrictions that limit the applicability of antibodies, intense efforts have been applied to identifying and engineering smaller alternative protein scaffolds for the modulation of intracellular targets. In parallel, innovative solutions for delivering proteins to the intracellular space while maintaining their stability and functional activity have begun to yield successes. This review provides an overview of bioactive intrabodies and alternative protein scaffolds amenable to engineering for intracellular targeting and also outlines advances in protein engineering and formulation for delivery of functional proteins to the interior of the cell to achieve therapeutic action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.