Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27547376›Full record

ArticleIrish veterinary journal2015

Assessment of an ELISA method to support surveillance of bovine tuberculosis in Albania.

Anita Koni, Arla Juma, Matteo Morini, Stefano Nardelli, Robert Connor, Xhelil Koleci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Irish veterinary journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. B Cell and Antibody Responses in Bovine Tuberculosis.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anita KoniVeterinary Public Health Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Agricultural University of Tirana, Kodër Kamëz, 1000 Tirana Albania.
Arla JumaInstitute of Food Safety and Veterinary, Porcelan, Rr. "Aleksander Moisiu", Nr.10, 1000 Tirana, Albania.
Matteo MoriniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell'Università 10, 35020 Legnaro, Padova Italy.
Stefano NardelliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell'Università 10, 35020 Legnaro, Padova Italy.
Robert ConnorVeterinary Public Health Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Agricultural University of Tirana, Kodër Kamëz, 1000 Tirana Albania.
Xhelil KoleciVeterinary Public Health Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Agricultural University of Tirana, Kodër Kamëz, 1000 Tirana Albania.
Agricultural University of Tirana · ALIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBovine tuberculosis (bTB) is an important bacterial infectious disease in Albania of concern to animal and human health; its prevalence is poorly documented.

methodsIn this longitudinal study, we tested by ELISA 2661 serum samples, from 154 herds, with the aim of establishing the suitability of this approach to screen the bovine population for bTB. In a follow-on survey of 87 animals in three villages, we assessed the usefulness of the Mycobacterium bovis IDEXX ELISA (IDEXX M. bovis Antibody (Ab) Test. IDEXX Europe B.V P.O. Box 1334, 2130 EK Hoofddorp, The Netherlands) assay by comparing IDEXX results with the results of the single intradermal cervical skin test. Skin tests were performed either after or at the time of collection of blood samples, and therefore cattle were not sensitized by tuberculin before serological testing.

resultsThe proportion of herds in which serologically positive cattle were found was 18.2 % (95 % CI, 1.9-25.8 %) and the prevalence of seropositive cattle was 1.4 % (95 % CI, 0.8-2.1 %). In the follow-up study, two of the 87 animals reacted positively to the skin test and two produced inconclusive reactions. No overlap was found between the four animals with positive IDEXX ELISA results and the four animals with non-negative skin test results.

conclusionThe lack of agreement between the results of the two tests may reflect different elements of the immune response (humoral and cell-mediated immunity). In future, cattle should be sensitized by the intradermal injection of tuberculin 14 days prior to the collection of blood samples, which would then be tested by the Mycobacterium bovis IDEXX ELISA Test in order to determine more accurately the prevalence of infection.

Indexed as

AlbaniaBovine TB seroprevalenceBovine TB skin testBovine tuberculosisIDEXX ELISA testMycobacterium bovis

Identifiers

PMID27547376
PMCPMC4992191
OpenAlexW2507959856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.