Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27547320›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2016

Mismatch in microbial food webs: predators but not prey perform better in their local biotic and abiotic conditions.

Elodie C Parain, Dominique Gravel, Rudolf P Rohr, Louis-Félix Bersier, Sarah M Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elodie C ParainDepartment of Biology - Ecology and EvolutionUniversity of Fribourg Chemin du Musée 101700 Fribourg Switzerland; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Ecology Yale University 165 Prospect Street New Haven Connecticut 06520.
Dominique GravelDépartement de Biologie, Chimie et Géographie Université du Québec à Rimouski 300 Allée des Ursulines Rimouski Quebec G5L 3A1 Canada; Département de Biologie - Ecologie Terrestre Université de Sherbrooke 2500, boulevard de l'Université Sherbrooke Quebec J1K 2R1 Canada.
Rudolf P RohrDepartment of Biology - Ecology and Evolution University of Fribourg Chemin du Musée 10 1700 Fribourg Switzerland.
Louis-Félix BersierDepartment of Biology - Ecology and Evolution University of Fribourg Chemin du Musée 10 1700 Fribourg Switzerland.
Sarah M GrayDepartment of Biology - Ecology and Evolution University of Fribourg Chemin du Musée 10 1700 Fribourg Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how trophic levels respond to changes in abiotic and biotic conditions is key for predicting how food webs will react to environmental perturbations. Different trophic levels may respond disproportionately to change, with lower levels more likely to react faster, as they typically consist of smaller-bodied species with higher reproductive rates. This response could cause a mismatch between trophic levels, in which predators and prey will respond differently to changing abiotic or biotic conditions. This mismatch between trophic levels could result in altered top-down and bottom-up control and changes in interaction strength. To determine the possibility of a mismatch, we conducted a reciprocal-transplant experiment involving Sarracenia purpurea food webs consisting of bacterial communities as prey and a subset of six morphologically similar protozoans as predators. We used a factorial design with four temperatures, four bacteria and protozoan biogeographic origins, replicated four times. This design allowed us to determine how predator and prey dynamics were altered by abiotic (temperature) conditions and biotic (predators paired with prey from either their local or non-local biogeographic origin) conditions. We found that prey reached higher densities in warmer temperature regardless of their temperature of origin. Conversely, predators achieved higher densities in the temperature condition and with the prey from their origin. These results confirm that predators perform better in abiotic and biotic conditions of their origin while their prey do not. This mismatch between trophic levels may be especially significant under climate change, potentially disrupting ecosystem functioning by disproportionately affecting top-down and bottom-up control.

Indexed as

Consumer‐resourcepredator–preyreciprocal‐transplant experimentSarracenia purpureatemperature

Identifiers

PMID27547320
PMCPMC4979714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.