Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27547316›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2016

Can you hear me now? Range-testing a submerged passive acoustic receiver array in a Caribbean coral reef habitat.

Thomas H Selby, Kristen M Hart, Ikuko Fujisaki, Brian J Smith, Clayton J Pollock, Zandy Hillis-Starr, Ian Lundgren, Madan K Oli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas H SelbyFort Lauderdale Research and Education Center University of Florida 3205 College Avenue Davie Florida 33314.
Kristen M HartWetland and Aquatic Research Center United States Geological Survey 3321 College Avenue Davie Florida 33314.
Ikuko FujisakiFort Lauderdale Research and Education Center University of Florida 3205 College Avenue Davie Florida 33314.
Brian J SmithFort Lauderdale Research and Education Center University of Florida 3205 College Avenue Davie Florida 33314.
Clayton J PollockNational Park Service Buck Island Reef National Monument Christiansted St. Croix 008020-4611.
Zandy Hillis-StarrNational Park Service Buck Island Reef National Monument Christiansted St. Croix 008020-4611.
Ian LundgrenNaval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific, 258 Makalapa Dr, Suite 100 Honolulu Hawaii 96860-3139.
Madan K OliDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation University of Florida Newins-Ziegler Hall Gainesville Florida 32611-0430.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Submerged passive acoustic technology allows researchers to investigate spatial and temporal movement patterns of many marine and freshwater species. The technology uses receivers to detect and record acoustic transmissions emitted from tags attached to an individual. Acoustic signal strength naturally attenuates over distance, but numerous environmental variables also affect the probability a tag is detected. Knowledge of receiver range is crucial for designing acoustic arrays and analyzing telemetry data. Here, we present a method for testing a relatively large-scale receiver array in a dynamic Caribbean coastal environment intended for long-term monitoring of multiple species. The U.S. Geological Survey and several academic institutions in collaboration with resource management at Buck Island Reef National Monument (BIRNM), off the coast of St. Croix, recently deployed a 52 passive acoustic receiver array. We targeted 19 array-representative receivers for range-testing by submersing fixed delay interval range-testing tags at various distance intervals in each cardinal direction from a receiver for a minimum of an hour. Using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), we estimated the probability of detection across the array and assessed the effect of water depth, habitat, wind, temperature, and time of day on the probability of detection. The predicted probability of detection across the entire array at 100 m distance from a receiver was 58.2% (95% CI: 44.0-73.0%) and dropped to 26.0% (95% CI: 11.4-39.3%) 200 m from a receiver indicating a somewhat constrained effective detection range. Detection probability varied across habitat classes with the greatest effective detection range occurring in homogenous sand substrate and the smallest in high rugosity reef. Predicted probability of detection across BIRNM highlights potential gaps in coverage using the current array as well as limitations of passive acoustic technology within a complex coral reef environment.

Indexed as

Caribbean reefpassive acoustic telemetryrange‐testingVR2W

Identifiers

PMID27547316
PMCPMC4979710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.