Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27547195›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016

Brain Activity in Response to Trauma-specific, Negative, and Neutral Stimuli. A fMRI Study of Recent Road Traffic Accident Survivors.

Andre S Nilsen, Ines Blix, Siri Leknes, Øivind Ekeberg, Laila Skogstad, Tor Endestad, Bjørn C Østberg, Trond Heir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Structural brain correlates of childhood trauma with replication across two large, independent community-based samples.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andre S NilsenNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress StudiesOslo, Norway; Center for the Study of Human Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of OsloOslo, Norway.
Ines BlixNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies Oslo, Norway.
Siri LeknesCenter for the Study of Human Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of OsloOslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University HospitalOslo, Norway.
Øivind EkebergDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University HospitalOslo, Norway; Department of Behavioral Sciences in Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of OsloOslo, Norway.
Laila SkogstadResearch and Development, Department of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway.
Tor EndestadCenter for the Study of Human Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn C ØstbergInstitute of Psychiatry, King's College London London, UK.
Trond HeirNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress StudiesOslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of OsloOslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NONorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies · NOKing's College London · GBOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most studies of neuro-functional patterns in trauma-exposed individuals have been conducted considerable time after the traumatic event. Hence little is known about neuro-functional processing shortly after trauma-exposure. We investigated brain activity patterns in response to trauma reminders as well as neutral and negative stimuli in individuals who had recently (within 3 weeks) been involved in a road traffic accident (RTA). Twenty-three RTA survivors and 17 non-trauma-exposed healthy controls (HCs) underwent functional MRI while viewing Trauma-specific, Negative, and Neutral pictures. Data were analyzed from four a priori regions of interest, including bilateral amygdala, subcallosal cortex, and medial prefrontal cortex. In addition, we performed a whole brain analysis and functional connectivity analysis during stimulus presentation. For both groups, Negative stimuli elicited more activity in the amygdala bilaterally than did Neutral and Trauma-specific stimuli. The whole brain analysis revealed higher activation in sensory processing related areas (bilateral occipital and temporal cortices and thalamus) as well as frontal and superior parietal areas, for the RTA group compared to HC, for Trauma-specific stimuli contrasted with Neutral stimuli. We also observed higher functional connectivity for Trauma-specific stimuli, between bilateral amygdala and somatosensory areas, for the RTA group compared to controls, when contrasted with Neutral stimuli. We argue that these results might indicate an attentional sensory processing bias toward Trauma-specific stimuli for trauma exposed individuals, a result in line with findings from the post-traumatic stress disorder literature.

Indexed as

amygdalaattentional biasfunctional connectivityoccipital cortexroad traffic accidenttrauma-exposuretraumatic stressvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID27547195
PMCPMC4974943
OpenAlexW2509829157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.