Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27546765›Full record

Observational studyJournal of critical care2016

Psychosocial resiliency is associated with lower emotional distress among dyads of patients and their informal caregivers in the neuroscience intensive care unit.

Kelly M Shaffer, Eric Riklin, Jamie M Jacobs, Jonathan Rosand, Ana-Maria Vranceanu

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of critical care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly M ShafferPsychiatry Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Psychology Department, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Eric RiklinPsychiatry Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jamie M JacobsPsychiatry Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jonathan RosandDivision of Neurocritical and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ana-Maria VranceanuPsychiatry Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: avranceanu@partners.org.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Enhancing Scientific Inquiry in Clinical Neurosciences Through Methodology TrainiR25NS088248 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COFFEY, CHRISTOPHER S., GUTMANN, LAURIE · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS088248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study is to examine the associations of patients' and their informal caregivers' psychosocial resiliency factors with their own and their partners' emotion domains (distress, anxiety, depression, and anger) after admission to the neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU). MATERIALS AND

methodsEighty-three dyads of patients (total n = 87) and their informal caregivers (total n = 99) participated in this observational, cross-sectional study by self-reporting demographics and measures of resiliency factors (mindfulness [Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale Revised], coping [Measure of Coping Status-A], intimate bond [Intimate Bond Measure], self-efficacy [patients: General Self-Efficacy Scale; caregivers: Revised Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale]) and emotion domains (Emotion Thermometers) within 2 weeks of Neuro-ICU admission.

resultsThere were no differences between patients' and caregivers' levels of psychosocial resiliency, distress, or anxiety. Patients reported greater depression and anger relative to their caregivers. Overall, roughly half of patients (50.6%) and caregivers (42.4%) reported clinically significant emotional distress. Patients' and caregivers' own psychosocial resiliency factors were associated with their own, but not their partner's, emotion domains.

conclusionsFindings of high distress among both patients and caregivers at admission emphasize the importance of attending to the mental health of both patients and caregivers in the Neuro-ICU. As modifiable psychosocial resiliency factors were associated with emotion domains for both patients and caregivers, interventions to enhance these factors may ameliorate emotional distress among these vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedAngerAnxietyBrain Injuries, TraumaticBrain NeoplasmsCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionEmotionsFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterpersonal RelationsAngerAnxietyDepressionInformal caregiverNeuroscience ICUResilience

Identifiers

PMID27546765
PMCPMC8025311
OpenAlexW2476951573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.