Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27546718›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiological methods2016

Optimization of a sample processing protocol for recovery of Bacillus anthracis spores from soil.

Erin E Silvestri, David Feldhake, Dale Griffin, John Lisle, Tonya L Nichols, Sanjiv R Shah, Adin Pemberton, Frank W Schaefer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiological methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Persistence in time: the hunt forApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erin E SilvestriU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Homeland Security Research Center, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, MS NG16, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: Silvestri.Erin@epa.gov.
David FeldhakePegasus Technical Services, Inc., 46 East Hollister St., Cincinnati, OH 45219, United States. Electronic address: Feldhake.David@epa.gov.
Dale GriffinU. S. Geological Survey, Coastal and Marine Science Center, 600 4th Street South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, United States. Electronic address: dgriffin@usgs.gov.
John LisleU. S. Geological Survey, Coastal and Marine Science Center, 600 4th Street South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, United States. Electronic address: jlisle@usgs.gov.
Tonya L NicholsU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Homeland Security Research Center, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., MS 8801R, Washington D.C. 20460, United States. Electronic address: Nichols.Tonya@epa.gov.
Sanjiv R ShahU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Homeland Security Research Center, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., MS 8801R, Washington D.C. 20460, United States. Electronic address: Shah.Sanjiv@epa.gov.
Adin PembertonPegasus Technical Services, Inc., 46 East Hollister St., Cincinnati, OH 45219, United States. Electronic address: Pemberton.Adin@epa.gov.
Frank W SchaeferU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Homeland Security Research Center, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, MS NG16, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: fschaefer@zoomtown.com.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following a release of Bacillus anthracis spores into the environment, there is a potential for lasting environmental contamination in soils. There is a need for detection protocols for B. anthracis in environmental matrices. However, identification of B. anthracis within a soil is a difficult task. Processing soil samples helps to remove debris, chemical components, and biological impurities that can interfere with microbiological detection. This study aimed to optimize a previously used indirect processing protocol, which included a series of washing and centrifugation steps. Optimization of the protocol included: identifying an ideal extraction diluent, variation in the number of wash steps, variation in the initial centrifugation speed, sonication and shaking mechanisms. The optimized protocol was demonstrated at two laboratories in order to evaluate the recovery of spores from loamy and sandy soils. The new protocol demonstrated an improved limit of detection for loamy and sandy soils over the non-optimized protocol with an approximate matrix limit of detection at 14spores/g of soil. There were no significant differences overall between the two laboratories for either soil type, suggesting that the processing protocol will be robust enough to use at multiple laboratories while achieving comparable recoveries.

Indexed as

Bacillus anthracisSoil MicrobiologyBacteriological TechniquesCentrifugationCulture MediaEnvironmental MicrobiologyLaboratoriesSoilSonicationSpores, BacterialCulture MediaSoilBacillus anthracisIndirect processingLoamSandSoilSpores

Identifiers

PMID27546718
PMCPMC6816019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.