Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27546578›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016

Genetic Convergence in the Evolution of Male-Specific Color Patterns in Drosophila.

Sarah A Signor, Yang Liu, Mark Rebeiz, Artyom Kopp

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An enhancer ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative transcriptomics of 3 high-altitude passerine birds and their low-altitude relatives.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  10. A homeotic shift late in development drives mimetic color variation in a bumble bee.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah A SignorSection of Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address: ssignor@usc.edu.
Yang LiuDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Mark RebeizDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Artyom KoppDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Molecular Genetics of Sex-Specific Evolutionary InnovationsR01GM105726 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KOPP, ARTYOM · 2014 to 2016
$850k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convergent evolution provides a type of natural replication that can be exploited to understand the roles of contingency and constraint in the evolution of phenotypes and the gene networks that control their development. For sex-specific traits, convergence offers the additional opportunity for testing whether the same gene networks follow different evolutionary trends in males versus females. Here, we use an unbiased, systematic mapping approach to compare the genetic basis of evolutionary changes in male-limited pigmentation in several pairs of Drosophila species that represent independent evolutionary transitions. We find strong evidence for repeated recruitment of the same genes to specify similar pigmentation in different species. At one of these genes, ebony, we observe convergent evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic expression through cis-regulatory changes. However, this functional convergence has a different molecular basis in different species, reflecting both parallel fixation of ancestral alleles and independent origin of distinct mutations with similar functional consequences. Our results show that a strong evolutionary constraint at the gene level is compatible with a dominant role of chance at the molecular level.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene Expression RegulationAnimalsBase SequenceColorDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsMalePhenotypePhylogenyPigmentationSequence AlignmentSpecies SpecificityDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinse protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID27546578
OpenAlexW2507186392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.