ArticleEuropean journal of immunology2016
Aged B cells alter immune regulation of allografts in mice.
Article in European journal of immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Donor and Recipient Sex on Long-Term Outcomes Following Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Dual-Center Study.Clinical transplantation · 2025Observational
- Immune aging: biological mechanisms, clinical symptoms, and management in lung transplant recipients.Frontiers in transplantation · 2024Review
- The aging of the immune system and its implications for transplantation.GeroScience · 2023Review
- Nanoparticles reduce monocytes within the lungs to improve outcomes after influenza virus infection in aged mice.JCI insight · 2022Article
- Implications of Inflammatory States on Dysfunctional Immune Responses in Aging and Obesity.Frontiers in aging · 2021Review
- CD73 expression identifies a subset of IgMImmunology · 2017Article
- Aging and the immune response to organ transplantation.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Organ transplantation in older people is increasing, but how aging impacts B-cell responses to organ transplantation is still unknown. Here, we show that the depletion of B cells with anti-CD20 antibodies has disparate effects depending on recipient age. In young murine recipients, anti-CD20 treatment impaired the ability of immune modulation to extend skin allograft survival. In contrast, anti-CD20 treatment extended allograft survival in aged recipients treated with immune modulation. Although regulatory B-cell function and the numbers of marginal and follicular B cells were similar between age groups, a subpopulation of B cells, termed age-associated B cells (ABCs), accumulated upon aging. ABCs isolated from aged mice exhibited upregulation of CD73, CD80, CD106, and TLR2 and an increased capacity to augment T-cell alloimmunity compared to ABCs from young mice. Importantly, ABCs from aged, but not young, mice impaired the ability of immune modulation to enhance allograft survival after adoptive transfer into young transplant recipients. Our study indicates that ABCs impair the immune regulation of allografts. Thus, recipient age needs to be considered when proposing B-cell-depleting immune therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.