Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27545071›Full record

ReviewCellular & molecular immunology2017

Outrunning the Red Queen: bystander activation as a means of outpacing innate immune subversion by intracellular pathogens.

Alicia M Holmgren, Cameron A McConkey, Sunny Shin

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular & molecular immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Glucose metabolism and its role in the maturation and migration of human CD1cFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Human placental biology at single-cell resolution: a contemporaneous review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2022
    Review
  12. Immunosuppression in Malaria: DoPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alicia M HolmgrenDepatment of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6060, USA.
Cameron A McConkeyDepatment of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6060, USA.
Sunny ShinDepatment of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6060, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Innate immune-mediated control of pulmonary Legionella pneumophila infectionR01AI118861 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHIN, SUNNY · 2016 to 2025
$4.6M
Defining human noncanonical inflammasome responses to Legionella pneumophilaR01AI123243 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHIN, SUNNY · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118861NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Originally described by the late evolutionary biologist Leigh Van Valen, the Red Queen hypothesis posits that the evolutionary arms race between hosts and their pathogens selects for discrete, genetically encoded events that lead to competitive advantages over the other species. Examples of immune evasion strategies are seen throughout the co-evolution of the mammalian immune system and pathogens, such as the enzymatic inactivation of nuclear factor-κB signaling or host translation by pathogen-encoded virulence factors. Such immunoevasive maneuvers would be expected to select for the evolution of innate immune counterstrategies. Recent advances in our understanding of host immunity and microbial pathogenesis have provided insight into a particular innate immune adaptation, termed bystander activation. Bystander activation occurs as a consequence of infected cells alerting and instructing neighboring uninfected cells to produce inflammatory mediators, either through direct cell contact or paracrine signals. Thus, bystander activation can allow the immune system to overcome the ability of pathogens to disarm immune signaling in directly infected cells. This review presents an overview of the general hallmarks of bystander activation and their emerging role in innate immunity to intracellular pathogens, as well as examples of recent mechanistic discoveries relating to the bystander activation during infection with specific pathogens relevant to human health and disease.

Indexed as

Bystander EffectImmune EvasionImmunity, InnateModels, BiologicalAnimalsHumansIntracellular Space

Identifiers

PMID27545071
PMCPMC5214943
OpenAlexW2518219785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.