ArticleActa biomaterialia2016
Micropore-induced capillarity enhances bone distribution in vivo in biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Segmenting scaffolds with ingrown bone in micro-CT images: considerations of evaluation metrics and loss functions.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Creating Unidirectionally Macrochanneled Zirconia Bone Scaffolds with Elongated Microporous Frameworks via Vat Photopolymerization Using Phase-Separable, Photocurable Vehicle.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Ion-Based Strategy Toward Synergistic Surface Functionalization Combining the Osteogenic Properties and NIR-Mediated Antibacterial Activity of PEEK.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Direct ink writing of tantalum: tailorable hierarchical porous scaffold for osteogenesis.National science review · 2026Article
- Strontium and gallium doping enhancesMaterials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Evaluation of an angio-osseo inductive bone ceramic versus demineralised freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a randomised controlled clinical trial.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
- Calcium Phosphate Honeycomb Scaffolds with Tailored Microporous Walls Using Phase Separation-Assisted Digital Light Processing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Strategies for promoting neurovascularization in bone regeneration.Military Medical Research · 2025Review
- Review
- Granular osteoconductive biopolymer and predictive analysis of its physical property changes in maxillofacial surgery.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Tailoring the surface pore morphology of bioceramic scaffolds through colloidal processing for bone tissue engineering.PloS one · 2025Article
- Impact of Particle Size and Sintering Temperature on Calcium Phosphate Gyroid Structure Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Biodegradable composites with antibiotics and growth factors for dual release kinetics.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2024Article
- Biomaterial scaffolds in maxillofacial bone tissue engineering: A review of recent advances.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Red blood cell-derived materials for cancer therapy: Construction, distribution, and applications.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in Bioengineering Bone Revascularization Based on Composite Materials Comprising Hydroxyapatite.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Gear-shaped carbonate apatite granules with a hexagonal macropore for rapid bone regeneration.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Calcium Phosphate-Based Biomaterials for Bone Repair.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Pellet-Based Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)-Derived Process for the Development of Polylactic Acid/Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds Dedicated to Bone Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Laser Sintering Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledThe increasing demand for bone repair solutions calls for the development of efficacious bone scaffolds. Biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) scaffolds with both macropores and micropores (MP) have improved healing compared to those with macropores and no micropores (NMP), but the role of micropores is unclear. Here, we evaluate capillarity induced by micropores as a mechanism that can affect bone growth in vivo. Three groups of cylindrical scaffolds were implanted in pig mandibles for three weeks: MP were implanted either dry (MP-Dry), or after submersion in phosphate buffered saline, which fills pores with fluid and therefore suppresses micropore-induced capillarity (MP-Wet); NMP were implanted dry. The amount and distribution of bone in the scaffolds were quantified using micro-computed tomography. MP-Dry had a more homogeneous bone distribution than MP-Wet, although the average bone volume fraction, BVF‾, was not significantly different for these two groups (0.45±0.03 and 0.37±0.03, respectively). There was no significant difference in the radial bone distribution of NMP and MP-Wet, but the BVF‾, of NMP was significantly lower among the three groups (0.25±0.02). These results suggest that micropore-induced capillarity enhances bone regeneration by improving the homogeneity of bone distribution in BCP scaffolds. The explicit design and use of capillarity in bone scaffolds may lead to more effective treatments of large and complex bone defects. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The increasing demand for bone repair calls for more efficacious bone scaffolds and calcium phosphate-based materials are considered suitable for this application. Macropores (>100μm) are necessary for bone ingrowth and vascularization. However, studies have shown that microporosity (<20μm) also enhances growth, but there is no consensus on the controlling mechanisms. In previous in vitro work, we suggested that micropore-induced capillarity had the potential to enhance bone growth in vivo. This work illustrates the positive effects of capillarity on bone regeneration in vivo; it demonstrates that micropore-induced capillarity significantly enhances the bone distribution in the scaffold. The results will impact the design of scaffolds to better exploit capillarity and improve treatments for large and load-bearing bone defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.