ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2017
Tissue microarray technique is applicable to bone marrow biopsies of myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- In focus in HCB.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue microarray (TMA) technique is an established high-throughput method to analyze multiple tissue specimens in parallel. However, in order to obtain reliable results from immunohistochemical analyses of TMA blocks, cell composition of TMA spots must correspond to whole tissue sections (WTS) particularly in tissues with a heterogeneous cell composition as it is the case in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). The aim of this study was to validate TMA of bone marrow biopsies from MPN patients. TMAs of MPN bone marrow biopsies (ET: n = 26, PV: n = 26, and PMF: n = 29) were compiled in triplicates and MPN-specific histological parameters were assessed. Results of TMA spots were compared with WTS' results using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Immunohistochemical NFE2 and calreticulin stainings of the TMA with quantitative evaluation were performed. TMA construction was technically successful with a loss of 10 % of all spots. ICC calculation revealed high to moderate correlations of TMA with WTS, especially the parameters that are typically affected in MPN tissue, e.g. cellularity of hematopoiesis (ICC 0.62-0.89), number of megakaryocytes (ICC 0.50-0.71), micro-vessel density (ICC 0.56-0.91), or grade of myelofibrosis (ICC 0.56-0.89). Results of NFE2 and calreticulin immunohistochemistry of MPN TMAs are consistent with previously published data. Overall, our results show moderate to good correlation between histological data of WTS and TMA spots illustrating that the TMA technique is applicable to bone marrow biopsies of MPN patients. However, TMA construction in triplicates is necessary to reach sufficient correlation. MPN TMAs can be applied for serial immunohistochemical surveys of archived tissues to assess the mutation status or to further sub-classify MPN cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.