Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27544476›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2016

Non-human primate models of SIV infection and CNS neuropathology.

Kenneth Williams, Andrew Lackner, Jaclyn Mallard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Animal models for studies of HIV-1 brain reservoirs.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A Quantitative Approach to SIV Functional Latency in Brain Macrophages.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kenneth WilliamsDepartment of Biology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA. Electronic address: williauy@bc.edu.
Andrew LacknerTulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, LA, USA.
Jaclyn MallardDepartment of Biology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.

Funding

ZETA CHAIN OF T CELL RECEPTOR INTERACTS W/ NEF OF SIV &HIV2P51RR000168 · NCRR · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI ROWLETT, JAMES K · 1985 to 2011
$139.3M
MONOCYTE TRAFFIC AND THE NEUROPATHOGENESIS OF AIDSR01NS040237 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI Robert Blair, Woong-Ki Kim · 1999 to 2026
$11.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000168NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-human primate models of AIDS and neuroAIDS are the premiere model of HIV infection of the CNS and neuropathogenesis. This review discusses current SIV infection models of neuroAIDS emphasizing findings in the last two years. Consistent in these findings is the interplay between host factors that regulate immune responses to virus and viral replication. Several rapid models of AIDS with consistent CNS pathogenesis exist, each of which modulates by antibody treatment or viruses that cause rapid immune suppression and replicate well in macrophages. Consistent in all of these models are data underscoring the importance of monocyte and macrophage activation, infection and accumulation in the CNS.

Indexed as

AIDS Dementia ComplexDisease Models, AnimalSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAnimalsCentral Nervous SystemEncephalitis, ViralHumansMacaca mulattaMacrophagesMonocytesSimian Immunodeficiency VirusVirus Replication

Identifiers

PMID27544476
PMCPMC5021597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.