Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27544428›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2016

An Internet-based treatment for flying phobia (NO-FEAR Airlines): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Daniel Campos, Juana Bretón-López, Cristina Botella, Adriana Mira, Diana Castilla, Rosa Baños, Miquel Tortella-Feliu, Soledad Quero

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02298478 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of an Internet-based Treatment for Flying Phobia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat Jaume IRan2015 to 2017Enrolled69ConditionsFlying PhobiaArmsNO-FEAR Airlines
NCT03900559 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

An Internet-based Treatment for Flying Phobia Using 360º Images: A Feasibility Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat Jaume IRan2018 to 2021Enrolled78ConditionsFlying PhobiaArmsNO-FEAR Airlines
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel CamposUniversitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Juana Bretón-LópezUniversitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Cristina BotellaUniversitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Adriana MiraUniversitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Diana CastillaUniversitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Rosa BañosCIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Madrid, Spain.
Miquel Tortella-FeliuUniversitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Soledad QueroUniversitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain. squero@uji.es.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESUniversitat Jaume I · ESUniversitat de les Illes Balears · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlying phobia (FP) is a common and disabling mental disorder. Although in vivo exposure is the treatment of choice, it is linked to a number of limitations in its implementation. Particularly important, is the limited access to the feared stimulus (i.e., plane). Moreover, the economic cost of in vivo exposure should be specially considered as well as the difficulty of applying the exposure technique in an appropriate way; controlling important variables such as the duration of the exposure or the number of sessions. ICTs could help to reduce these limitations. Computer-assisted treatments have remarkable advantages in treating FP. Furthermore, they can be delivered through the Internet, increasing their advantages and reaching more people in need. The Internet has been established as an effective way to treat a wide range of mental disorders. However, as far as we know, no controlled studies exist on FP treatment via the Internet. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an Internet-based treatment for FP (NO-FEAR Airlines) versus a waiting list control group. Secondary objectives will be to explore two ways of delivering NO-FEAR Airlines, with or without therapist guidance, and study the patients' acceptance of the program. This paper presents the study protocol. METHODS/

designThe study is a randomized controlled trial. A minimum of 57 participants will be randomly assigned to three conditions: a) NO-FEAR Airlines totally self-applied, b) NO-FEAR Airlines with therapist guidance, or c) a waiting list control group (6 weeks). Primary outcomes measures will be the Fear of Flying Questionnaire-II and the Fear of Flying Scale. Secondary outcomes will be included to assess other relevant clinical measures, such as the Fear and Avoidance Scales, Clinician Severity Scale, and Patient's Improvement scale. Analyses of post-treatment flights will be conducted. Treatment acceptance and preference measures will also be included. Intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses will be conducted. DISCUSSION: An Internet-based treatment for FP could have considerable advantages in managing in vivo exposure limitations, specifically in terms of access to treatment, acceptance, adherence, and the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. This is the first randomized controlled trial to study this issue.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT02298478 . Trial registration date 3 November 2014.

Indexed as

InternetWaiting ListsFearHumansPhobic DisordersSingle-Blind MethodSurveys and QuestionnairesTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeFlying phobiaInternet-based exposureRandomized controlled trialSelf-helpVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID27544428
PMCPMC4992303
OpenAlexW2512924759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.