Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27544284›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2017

A common strategy for initiating the transition from proliferation to quiescence.

Shawna Miles, Linda Breeden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The longevity and reversibility of quiescence inCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. E2F4-Based Gene Therapy Mitigates the Phenotype of the Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Model 5xFAD.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Replication-independent instability of Friedreich's ataxia GAA repeats during chronological aging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Cellular quiescence in budding yeast.Yeast (Chichester, England) · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Quiescence, an individual journey.Current genetics · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shawna MilesBasic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Linda BreedenBasic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. lbreeden@fredhutch.org.

Funding

Budding yeast longevityR21AG048595 · NIA · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BREEDEN, LINDA L. · 2014 to 2015
$477k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG048595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development, tissue renewal and long term survival of multi-cellular organisms is dependent upon the persistence of stem cells that are quiescent, but retain the capacity to re-enter the cell cycle to self-renew, or to produce progeny that can differentiate and re-populate the tissue. Deregulated release of these cells from the quiescent state, or preventing them from entering quiescence, results in uncontrolled proliferation and cancer. Conversely, loss of quiescent cells, or their failure to re-enter cell division, disrupts organ development and prevents tissue regeneration and repair. Understanding the quiescent state and how cells control the transitions in and out of this state is of fundamental importance. Investigations into the mechanics of G1 arrest during the transition to quiescence continue to identify striking parallels between the strategies used by yeast and mammals to regulate this transition. When cells commit to a stable but reversible arrest, the G1/S genes responsible for promoting S phase must be inhibited. This process, from yeast to humans, involves the formation of quiescence-specific complexes on their promoters. In higher cells, these so-called DREAM complexes of E2F4/DP/RBL/MuvB recruit the highly conserved histone deacetylase HDAC1, which leads to local histone deacetylation and repression of S phase-promoting transcripts. Quiescent yeast cells also show pervasive histone deacetylation by the HDAC1 counterpart Rpd3. In addition, these cells contain quiescence-specific regulators of G1/S genes: Msa1 and Msa2, which can be considered components of the yeast equivalent of the DREAM complex. Despite a lack of physical similarities, the goals and the strategies used to achieve a reversible transition to quiescence are highly conserved. This motivates a detailed study of this process in the simple model organism: budding yeast.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsCell DivisionG1 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsGene ExpressionHistone Deacetylase 1Histone DeacetylasesHumansModels, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsS PhaseCell Cycle ProteinsHDAC1 protein, humanHistone Deacetylase 1Histone DeacetylasesRPD3 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsE2FHDAC1Msa1Msa2MuvBRBRpd3SBF

Identifiers

PMID27544284
PMCPMC5508718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.