Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27544266›Full record

Observational studyBMC pharmacology & toxicology2016

Potentially inappropriate medications in elderly ambulatory and institutionalized patients: an observational study.

Daniela Petruta Primejdie, Marius Traian Bojita, Adina Popa

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniela Petruta PrimejdieDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, 12 Ion Creanga St, 400010, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. danaprimejdie@gmail.com.
Marius Traian BojitaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, 6 Louis Pasteur St, 400349, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Adina PopaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, 12 Ion Creanga St, 400010, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe elderly are frequently exposed to drug related problems causing hospitalizations and increased costs of care. Information about Romanian prescribing practices among the elderly and potential medication associated- risks is lacking. The objective of this study was to identify and compare the most frequent potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) recommended to ambulatory and institutionalized Romanian elderly, through an observational retrospective design.

methodsAll reimbursed medications prescribed to a sample of ambulatory elderly accessing two community pharmacies and all medications recommended to a group of institutionalized elderly (urban facilities, Romania, same month) were analyzed. The STOPP/START criteria and the PRISCUS list were used for PIM identification and for classification as misprescribed, underprescribed or overprescribed -subtypes.

resultsThe analysis involved 345 prescriptions recommended to ambulatory elderly and 91 medical files available for the institutionalized patients. The ambulatory elderly had a mean age of 74.8 years old and were daily exposed to a median number of 3 prescribed medications. The institutionalized elderly were older (mean age 80.77) received 8 medications daily and 69 % of them were functionally dependent. Cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric indications were the most frequent: 64.34 % and 18.55 % of the ambulatory prescriptions, 93.40 % and 41.75 % of the institutionalized patients' medical files. 159 PIM were identified on 34.49 % of the ambulatory prescriptions. 82.41 % of the institutionalized patients' medical files contained 140 PIM. The potential underprescribing of cardiovascular therapies was the most frequent PIM category on the ambulatory prescriptions (55.34 % of all PIM), while for the institutionalized patients' medical files, the misprescribed and overprescribed PIM were those predominantly represented (62.14 % and 27.14 % of all PIM). In both subgroups of data, NSAIDs (56.66 % of ambulatory prescriptions and 35.63 % of institutionalized patients' data) and benzodiazepines (26.66 % of ambulatory prescriptions and 24.13 % of institutionalized patient's data) were predominantly misprescribed. Anticholinergics were rarely used (0.62 % of total PIM from ambulatory prescriptions, 2.14 % of total PIM from institutionalized patients' data).

conclusionsThe PIM identified in both elderly groups suggested potential risks for the occurrence of adverse events specific to the elderly population. Larger studies, both observational and interventional, are needed to ensure a safer therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingInstitutionalizationMaleOsteoarthritisPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsRomaniaAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAmbulatory elderlyDrug -related problemsInappropriate prescribingInstitutionalized elderlyPRISCUS listSTOPP/START criteria

Identifiers

PMID27544266
PMCPMC4992561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.