Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27543885›Full record

ArticlePsychoneuroendocrinology2016

Common variant in OXTR predicts growth in positive emotions from loving-kindness training.

Suzannah F Isgett, Sara B Algoe, Aaron J Boulton, Baldwin M Way, Barbara L Fredrickson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interparental Positivity Spillover Theory: How Parents' Positive Relational Interactions Influence Children.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suzannah F IsgettDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #3270, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Sara B AlgoeDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #3270, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Aaron J BoultonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #3270, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Baldwin M WayDepartment of Psychology and Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University, 100G Lazenby Hall, 1827 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Barbara L FredricksonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #3270, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. Electronic address: blf@unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Affective and Genomic Mediators of Sustained Behavior ChangeR01NR012899 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FREDRICKSON, BARBARA LEE · 2010 to 2014
$2.7M
Promoting Cancer-related Behavior Change through Positive Emotions (PQ4)R01CA170128 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FREDRICKSON, BARBARA LEE · 2012 to 2015
$2.0M
Nonconscious Affective and Physiological Mediators of Behavioral Decision MakingR01AT007884 · NCCIH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FREDRICKSON, BARBARA LEE · 2013 to 2015
$1.3M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT007884NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170128NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ample research suggests that social connection reliably generates positive emotions. Oxytocin, a neuropeptide implicated in social cognition and behavior, is one biological mechanism that may influence an individual's capacity to extract positive emotions from social contexts. Because variation in certain genes may indicate underlying neurobiological differences, we tested whether several SNPs in two genes related to oxytocin signaling would show effects on positive emotions that were context-specific, depending on sociality. For six weeks, a sample of mid-life adults (N=122) participated in either socially-focused loving-kindness training or mindfulness training. During this timespan they reported their positive emotions daily. Five SNPs within OXTR and CD38 were assayed, and each was tested for its individual effect on daily emotions. The hypothesized three-way interaction between time, training type, and genetic variability emerged: Individuals homozygous for the G allele of OXTR rs1042778 experienced gains in daily positive emotions from loving-kindness training, whereas individuals with the T allele did not experience gains in positive emotions with either training. These findings are among the first to show how genetic differences in oxytocin signaling may influence an individual's capacity to experience positive emotions as a result of a socially-focused intervention.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMeditationMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptors, OxytocinOXTR protein, humanReceptors, OxytocinAffective scienceGeneticsMeditationOxytocinPositive psychologyVantage sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID27543885
PMCPMC5359600
OpenAlexW2511415957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.