ArticleIndian heart journal
STEMI vs NSTEACS management trends in non-invasive hospital.
Article in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the clinical features, management, and in-hospital outcomes of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS), in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia.
methodsA total of 71 patients were enrolled in a longitudinal study at a tertiary hospital without cardiac catheterization facility. These data were collected from Saudi Project for Assessment of Coronary Events registry.
resultsTwenty-three patients with STEMI were compared to 48 patients with NSTEACS. Mean age for STEMI was younger, 57.4±13.7 years compared to 63.2±13.9 years respectively (p=0.19). Forty-four percent arrived at the hospital by ambulance. History of hypertension and hyperlipidemia were more frequent in NSTEACS (p=0.05), while both groups showed no difference in diabetes mellitus, 17% vs 22% and smoking, 30% vs 17%. In-hospital medications were: Aspirin (100%) both groups, Clopidogrel (91% vs 100%) (p=0.03). There was more aggressive use of beta-blockers (74% vs 95%) (p=0.01) and statins (87% vs 100%) (p=0.01) in NSTEACS. In-hospital outcomes showed one recurrent myocardial infarction and one death in NSTEACS group (2%). Other outcome in the two groups showed recurrent ischemia (13% vs 29%) (p=0.14) and cardiogenic shock (9% vs 2%) (p=0.17). No stroke or major bleeding was reported in both groups.
conclusionNSTEACS patients in western province of KSA present at an older age are mostly males and have higher prevalence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia compared with STEMI patients. It is therefore important to identify patients with high-risk profile and put implement measures to reduce these factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.