Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27543286›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2016

From malaria control to elimination in South Africa: The researchers' perspectives.

Khumbulani W Hlongwana, Joyce Tsoka-Gwegweni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khumbulani W HlongwanaSchool of Nursing & Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal. hlongwanak@ukzn.ac.za.
Joyce Tsoka-Gwegweni
University of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal decline in malaria episodes over the past decade gave rise to a debate to target malaria elimination in eligible countries. However, investigation regarding researchers' perspectives on barriers and facilitating factors to effective implementation of a malaria elimination policy in South Africa (SA) is lacking.

aimThe aim of this study was to investigate the malaria researchers' knowledge, understandings, perceived roles, and their perspectives on the factors influencing implementation of a malaria elimination policy in SA.

settingParticipants were drawn from the researchers who fulfilled the eligibility criteria as per the protocol, and the criteria were not setting-specific.

methodsThe study was a descriptive cross-sectional survey conducted through an emailed self-administered semi-structured questionnaire amongst malaria researchers who met the set selection criteria and signed informed consent.

resultsMost (92.3%) participants knew about SA's malaria elimination policy, but only 45.8% had fully read it. The majority held a strong view that SA's 2018 elimination target was not realistic, citing that the policy had neither been properly adapted to the country's operational setting nor sufficiently disseminated to all relevant healthcare workers. Key concerns raised were lack of new tools, resources, and capacity to fight malaria; poor cross-border collaborations; overreliance on partners to implement; poor community involvement; and poor surveillance.

conclusionMalaria elimination is a noble idea, with sharp divisions. However, there is a general agreement that elimination requires: (a) strong cross-border initiatives; (b) deployment of adequate resources;

Indexed as

Disease EradicationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PolicyHumansMalariaMaleMiddle AgedResearch PersonnelSouth AfricaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27543286
PMCPMC4992188
OpenAlexW2504015208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.