Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27543135›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2016

Establishing the Canadian HIV Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study (CHIWOS): Operationalizing Community-based Research in a Large National Quantitative Study.

Mona Loutfy, Saara Greene, V Logan Kennedy, Johanna Lewis, Jamie Thomas-Pavanel, Tracey Conway, Alexandra de Pokomandy, Nadia O'Brien, Allison Carter, Wangari Tharao and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Mona LoutfyWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 76 Grenville St., Room 6415, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 1B2. mona.loutfy@wchospital.ca.
Saara GreeneSchool of Social Work, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
V Logan KennedyWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 76 Grenville St., Room 6415, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 1B2.
Johanna LewisWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 76 Grenville St., Room 6415, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 1B2.
Jamie Thomas-PavanelWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 76 Grenville St., Room 6415, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 1B2.
Tracey ConwayWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 76 Grenville St., Room 6415, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 1B2.
Alexandra de PokomandyDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nadia O'BrienDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Allison CarterFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Wangari TharaoWomen's Health in Women's Hands Community Health Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Valerie NicholsonFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Kerrigan BeaverWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 76 Grenville St., Room 6415, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 1B2.
Danièle DubucChronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jacqueline GahaganHealth Promotion Division, Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Karène Proulx-BoucherChronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Robert S HoggFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Angela KaidaFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
CHIWOS Research Team

Funding

CIHR MOP-111041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-based research has gained increasing recognition in health research over the last two decades. Such participatory research approaches are lauded for their ability to anchor research in lived experiences, ensuring cultural appropriateness, accessing local knowledge, reaching marginalized communities, building capacity, and facilitating research-to-action. While having these positive attributes, the community-based health research literature is predominantly composed of small projects, using qualitative methods, and set within geographically limited communities. Its use in larger health studies, including clinical trials and cohorts, is limited. We present the Canadian HIV Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study (CHIWOS), a large-scale, multi-site, national, longitudinal quantitative study that has operationalized community-based research in all steps of the research process. Successes, challenges and further considerations are offered. DISCUSSION: Through the integration of community-based research principles, we have been successful in: facilitating a two-year long formative phase for this study; developing a novel survey instrument with national involvement; training 39 Peer Research Associates (PRAs); offering ongoing comprehensive support to PRAs; and engaging in an ongoing iterative community-based research process. Our community-based research approach within CHIWOS demanded that we be cognizant of challenges managing a large national team, inherent power imbalances and challenges with communication, compensation and volunteering considerations, and extensive delays in institutional processes. It is important to consider the iterative nature of community-based research and to work through tensions that emerge given the diverse perspectives of numerous team members.

conclusionsCommunity-based research, as an approach to large-scale quantitative health research projects, is an increasingly viable methodological option. Community-based research has several advantages that go hand-in-hand with its obstacles. We offer guidance on implementing this approach, such that the process can be better planned and result in success.

Indexed as

AdultCanadaCohort StudiesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHumansReproductive HealthSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesWomen's Health ServicesCHIWOSCohort studyCommunity-based researchHIVResearch methodologyWomen

Identifiers

PMID27543135
PMCPMC4992236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.