Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27543102›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2016

False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing.

Yanal M Murad, Justo Perez, Gustavo Ybazeta, Sarah Mavin, Sebastien Lefebvre, J Scott Weese, Joyce Rousseau, Francisco Diaz-Mitoma, Reza Nokhbeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Informing estimates of probability ofAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Low-toxinEmerging microbes & infections · 2022
    Article
  7. Diagnostic Methods ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanal M MuradCurrent Address: Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, 41 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 5J1, Canada. yamurad@nosm.ca.
Justo PerezCurrent Address: Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, 41 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 5J1, Canada.
Gustavo YbazetaCurrent Address: Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, 41 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 5J1, Canada.
Sarah MavinNorthern Ontario School of Medicine, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada.
Sebastien LefebvreCurrent Address: Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, 41 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 5J1, Canada.
J Scott WeeseCentre for Public Health and Zoonoses, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Joyce RousseauCentre for Public Health and Zoonoses, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Francisco Diaz-MitomaCurrent Address: Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, 41 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 5J1, Canada.
Reza NokhbehCurrent Address: Advanced Medical Research Institute of Canada, 41 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 5J1, Canada. rnokhbeh@amric.ca.
NOSM University · CAUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is paramount for patient management. The wrong diagnosis places patients at risk, delays treatment, and/ or contributes to transmission of infection in the healthcare setting. Although amplification of the toxin B gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive method for detecting toxigenic C. difficile, false negative results still occur and could impact the diagnosis and treatment of this infection.

methodsThis study investigated 48 patients that tested negative for toxigenic C. difficile via GeneXpert C. difficile epi test, while simultaneously testing positive for toxigenic C. difficile via stool culture. Fifty discrepant samples were collected over a 15-month period and all C. difficile isolates were characterized by ribotype. Patient charts were reviewed to assess whether discrepant results impacted the treatment course or clinical outcome of affected patients.

resultsFifty samples of a total of 2308 samples tested in an acute healthcare facility over a 15-month period had negative PCR and positive stool culture for toxigenic C. difficile. C. difficile isolated from the discrepant samples resulted in diverse ribotyping patterns suggesting they were derived from different strains. The samples belonged to patients who were distributed evenly between age groups and wards in the hospital. In the majority of cases, the false negative C. difficile test results did not seem to impact the clinical outcome in these patients.

conclusionsThe PCR limit of detection may impact the results of molecular methods for C. difficile detection. Both clinical and analytical sensitivity of C. difficile tests should be considered when deciding which diagnostic assay to use, and clinical correlates should be examined carefully before excluding CDI as a cause of disease.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsEnterotoxinsFalse Negative ReactionsFecesHumansMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionReagent Kits, DiagnosticRibotypingBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsEnterotoxinsReagent Kits, DiagnostictcdA protein, Clostridium difficiletoxB protein, Clostridium difficileClostridium difficileFalse negativeMolecular testing

Identifiers

PMID27543102
PMCPMC4992222
OpenAlexW2511449838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.