Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27543093›Full record

ReviewBMC veterinary research2016

Causes, consequences and biomarkers of stress in swine: an update.

Silvia Martínez-Miró, Fernando Tecles, Marina Ramón, Damián Escribano, Fuensanta Hernández, Josefa Madrid, Juan Orengo, Silvia Martínez-Subiela, Xavier Manteca, José Joaquín Cerón

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC veterinary research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Effects of the Rearing System, Genotype at theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Enrichment containingVeterinary and animal science · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Role of C17 fengycin B fromApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Silvia Martínez-MiróDepartment of Animal Production, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain. silviamm@um.es.
Fernando TeclesDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain. ftecles@um.es.
Marina RamónDepartment of Animal Production, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Damián EscribanoDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Fuensanta HernándezDepartment of Animal Production, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Josefa MadridDepartment of Animal Production, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Juan OrengoDepartment of Animal Production, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Silvia Martínez-SubielaDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Xavier MantecaDepartment of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
José Joaquín CerónDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent decades there has been a growing concern about animal stress on intensive pig farms due to the undesirable consequences that stress produces in the normal physiology of pigs and its effects on their welfare and general productive performance. This review analyses the most important types of stress (social, environmental, metabolic, immunological and due to human handling), and their biological consequences for pigs. The physio-pathological changes associated with stress are described, as well as the negative effects of stress on pig production. In addition an update of the different biomarkers used for the evaluation of stress is provided. These biomarkers can be classified into four groups according to the physiological system or axis evaluated: sympathetic nervous system, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and immune system.

conclusionsStress it is a process with multifactorial causes and produces an organic response that generates negative effects on animal health and production. Ideally, a panel of various biomarkers should be used to assess and evaluate the stress resulting from diverse causes and the different physiological systems involved in the stress response. We hope that this review will increase the understanding of the stress process, contribute to a better control and reduction of potential stressful stimuli in pigs and, finally, encourage future studies and developments to better monitor, detect and manage stress on pig farms.

Indexed as

BiomarkersStress, PhysiologicalAnimal HusbandryAnimalsSwineBiomarkersBiomarkersPigsStress

Identifiers

PMID27543093
PMCPMC4992232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.