Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27542606›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2016

Reliable gene expression profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissue (FFPE) using cDNA-mediated annealing, extension, selection, and ligation whole-genome (DASL WG) assay.

Mahesh Iddawela, Oscar M Rueda, Marcus Klarqvist, Stefan Graf, Helena M Earl, Carlos Caldas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahesh IddawelaCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK. mahesh.iddawela@monash.edu.
Oscar M RuedaCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK.
Marcus KlarqvistCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK.
Stefan GrafCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK.
Helena M EarlDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB1 9RN, UK.
Carlos CaldasCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK.
Cancer Research UK · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16942Cancer Research UK 9675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe difficulties in using formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour specimens for molecular marker studies have hampered progress in translational cancer research. The cDNA-mediated, annealing, selection, extension, and ligation (DASL) assay is a platform for gene expression profiling from FFPE tissue and hence could allow analysis of large collections of tissue with associated clinical data from existing archives, therefore facilitating the development of novel biomarkers.

methodRNA isolated from matched fresh frozen (FF) and FFPE cancer specimens was profiled using both the DASL whole-genome (WG) platform, and Illumina BeadArray's, and results were compared. Samples utilized were obtained from the breast cancer tumour bank held at the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

resultsThe number of reliably detected probes was comparable between the DASL and BeadArray platforms, indicating that the source of RNA did not result in a significant difference in the detection rates (Mean probes- 17114 in FFPE & 17400 in FF). There was a significant degree of correlation between replicates within the FF and FFPE sample sets (r (2) = 0.96-0.98) as well as between the two platforms (DASL vs. BeadArray r (2) = range 0.83-0.89). Hierarchical clustering using the most informative probes showed that replicate and matched samples were grouped into the same sub-cluster, regardless of whether RNA was derived from FF or FFPE tissue.

conclusionBoth FF and FFPE material generated reproducible gene expression profiles, although there was more noise in profiles from FFPE specimens. We have shown that the DASL WG platform is suitable for profiling formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, but robust bioinformatics analysis is required.

Indexed as

FormaldehydeParaffin EmbeddingTissue FixationBreast NeoplasmsDNA, ComplementaryGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsDNA, ComplementaryFormaldehydeBreast CancerFFPEMolecular MarkersWG DASL

Identifiers

PMID27542606
PMCPMC4992321
OpenAlexW2508854357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.