Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27542601›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Using discrete choice experiments as a decision aid in total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Michelle M Dowsey, Anthony Scott, Elizabeth A Nelson, Jinhu Li, Vijaya Sundararajan, Mandana Nikpour, Peter F M Choong

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michelle M DowseyDepartment of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, St. Vincent's Hospital, Level 2 Clinical Sciences Building, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, Melbourne, 3065, VIC, Australia. mmdowsey@unimelb.edu.au.
Anthony ScottMelbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Elizabeth A NelsonDepartment of Orthopaedics, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Jinhu LiMelbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Vijaya SundararajanDepartment of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Mandana NikpourDepartments of Medicine and Rheumatology, St. Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter F M ChoongDepartment of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, St. Vincent's Hospital, Level 2 Clinical Sciences Building, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, Melbourne, 3065, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in developed nations. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a clinically effective treatment for people with end-stage knee OA, and represents one of the highest volume medical interventions globally. However, up to one in three patients remain dissatisfied following TKA. Research indicates that the strongest predictor of patient dissatisfaction following TKA is unmet expectations. This study will use a discrete choice experiment (DCE) provided to patients to improve knowledge of the expected outcomes of TKA. This increased knowledge is based on actual outcome data and is hypothesised to optimise patient expectations of TKA outcomes, thereby increasing their satisfaction and self-reported health outcomes. METHODS/

designOne hundred and thirty-two people with end-stage OA on the waiting list for TKA will be recruited and randomly allocated to one of two groups using computer-generated block randomisation. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) adhering to SPIRIT and CONSORT guidelines will evaluate the effect of administering a DCE prior to surgery on patient-reported pain and function and satisfaction following TKA. Patients in the intervention arm will complete a survey containing the DCE, compared to the control group who will complete a modified survey that does not contain the DCE activity. The DCE contains information on actual risks of postoperative complications, as well as health status after TKA. The DCE encourages patients to actively make trade-offs between risks and health outcomes to elicit their preferences. Participants in both groups will be required to complete the survey after consenting to have the procedure, but prior to surgery during their routine preadmission appointment at St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (SVHM). Patients in both the intervention and control groups will also be required to complete a brief patient expectation survey 1 week prior to scheduled TKA. In addition, orthopaedic surgeons will complete a brief expectations survey for each patient consented for TKA to compare matched surgeon and patient expectations for recovery following TKA. Primary outcomes will be evaluated by a blinded examiner at 12 months post surgery using a validated self-reported pain and physical function scale, and a validated patient satisfaction scale. Secondary outcomes will include a range of validated measures of health and psychological wellbeing. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis using linear regression models. DISCUSSION: This study is the first of its kind to use a DCE to provide information to patients to optimise their expectations of the outcomes of surgery. Reducing the rate of patient dissatisfaction commonly seen in patients following TKA will help to reduce the burden associated with poor outcomes on the health system.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12615001226594p ). Version 1; registered on 9 November 2015.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeClinical ProtocolsDecision Support TechniquesHumansOsteoarthritis, KneeOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient SatisfactionSample SizeDiscrete choice experimentOutcomesPatient expectationsRisk perceptionTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID27542601
PMCPMC4992237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.