Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27542596›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Dynamic changes of tumor gene expression during repeated pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in women with peritoneal cancer.

Günther A Rezniczek, Friederike Jüngst, Hendrik Jütte, Andrea Tannapfel, Ziad Hilal, Lukas A Hefler, Marc-André Reymond, Clemens B Tempfer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Inhaled Cisplatin for NSCLC: Facts and Results.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Günther A RezniczekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany. guenther.rezniczek@rub.de.
Friederike JüngstDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Hendrik JütteDepartment of Pathology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Andrea TannapfelDepartment of Pathology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Ziad HilalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Lukas A HeflerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern, Linz, Austria.
Marc-André ReymondDepartment of Surgery, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Clemens B TempferDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Ruhr University Bochum · DEOrdensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern · ATUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraperitoneal chemotherapy is used to treat peritoneal cancer. The pattern of gene expression changes of peritoneal cancer during intraperitoneal chemotherapy has not been studied before. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy is a new form of intraperitoneal chemotherapy using repeated applications and allowing repeated tumor sampling during chemotherapy. Here, we present the analysis of gene expression changes during pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cisplatin using a 22-gene panel.

methodsTotal RNA was extracted from 152 PC samples obtained from 63 patients in up to six cycles of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to determine the gene expression levels. For select genes, immunohistochemistry was used to verify gene expression changes observed on the transcript level on the protein level. Observed (changes in) expression levels were correlated with clinical outcomes.

resultsGene expression profiles differed significantly between peritoneal cancer and non- peritoneal cancer samples and between ascites-producing and non ascites-producing peritoneal cancers. Changes of gene expression patterns during repeated intraperitoneal chemotherapy cycles were prognostic of overall survival, suggesting a molecular tumor response of peritoneal cancer. Specifically, downregulation of the whole gene panel during intraperitoneal chemotherapy was associated with better treatment response and survival.

conclusionsIn summary, molecular changes of peritoneal cancer during pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy can be documented and may be used to refine individual treatment and prognostic estimations.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAscitesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMiddle AgedPeritoneal NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapyGene signaturePeritoneal cancerPIPACPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID27542596
PMCPMC4992274
OpenAlexW2515053513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.