Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27542253›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Luminal B breast cancer: patterns of recurrence and clinical outcome.

Zhi-Hua Li, Ping-Hua Hu, Jian-Hong Tu, Ni-Si Yu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Design, synthesis, molecular docking, andSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Use of the Gene Expression Test ProsignaBreast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The elusive Luminal B breast cancer and the mysterious chemokines.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhi-Hua LiPrevention and Cure Center of Breast Disease, The Third Hospital of Nanchang City, Key Laboratory Of Breast Diseases In Jiangxi Province, Nanchang, JiangXi 330009, People's Republic of China.
Ping-Hua HuPrevention and Cure Center of Breast Disease, The Third Hospital of Nanchang City, Key Laboratory Of Breast Diseases In Jiangxi Province, Nanchang, JiangXi 330009, People's Republic of China.
Jian-Hong TuDepartment of Pathology, The Third Hospital of Nanchang City, JiangXi Breast Specialist Hospital, Nanchang, JiangXi 330009, People's Republic of China.
Ni-Si YuDepartment of Gynaecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi traditional Chinese Medicine University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, most studies on breast cancer relapse and metastasis have focused on non-luminal breast cancers (including the basal-like and HER-2 subtypes) because of their poor prognosis. However, the luminal B subtype is more common, but this type has not been investigated as thoroughly. In the current study, we collected data on 258 patients with luminal-B breast cancer patients with recurrence and metastasis served as the observation group, and 189 patients with non-luminal breast cancer during the same period served as the control group. This study aimed to investigate the pattern of recurrence and clinical outcome after follow-up treatment for luminal B breast cancer. We found a higher proportion of local recurrence and single bone metastasis in patients with luminal B breast cancer than in patients in the non-luminal groups. The risk of recurrence and metastasis in patients with luminal B breast cancer during a 2- to 5-year period and after 5 years was still present, but the risk in patients with non-luminal breast cancers had obviously decreased during the same period. Patients with luminal B breast cancer with recurrence or/and metastasis had a better prognosis after reasonable treatment. The recurrence patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with luminal B breast cancer according to HER2 status were also different, to some degree. These results are of potential clinical relevance especially for the monitoring of clinical prognosis and targeted therapy intervention for luminal B breast cancer.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaChinaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGenes, erbB-2HumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRiskTreatment Outcomebreast cancerluminal B subtypeprognosisrecurrence pattern

Identifiers

PMID27542253
PMCPMC5323135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.