Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27542211›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2016

Phase I/II study of azacitidine and capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in refractory CIMP-high metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of circulating methylated vimentin.

Michael J Overman, Van Morris, Helen Moinova, Ganiraju Manyam, Joe Ensor, Michael S Lee, Cathy Eng, Bryan Kee, David Fogelman, Rachna T Shroff and 9 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Epigenetics of colorectal cancer: biomarker and therapeutic potential.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J OvermanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Van MorrisDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Helen MoinovaDepartment of Medicine and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University and Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ganiraju ManyamDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Joe EnsorHouston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Michael S LeeDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Cathy EngDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Bryan KeeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
David FogelmanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Rachna T ShroffDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Thomas LaFramboiseDepartment of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Thibault MazardDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Tian FengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Stanley HamiltonDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Bradley BroomDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
James LutterbaughDepartment of Medicine and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University and Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jean-Pierre IssaFels Institute for Cancer and Molecular Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sanford D MarkowitzDepartment of Medicine and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University and Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Scott KopetzDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCase Western Reserve University · USHouston Methodist · USTemple University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity School · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Paul Calabresi Clinical Oncology AwardK12CA088084 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI David S. Hong, Scott Kopetz · 2000 to 2026
$14.0M
Identify and validate novel epigenetic molecular markers for colorectal neoplasmU01CA152756 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY, GUDA, KISHORE · 2010 to 2021
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA088084NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHypermethylation of promoter CpG islands (CIMP) has been strongly implicated in chemotherapy resistance and is implicated in the pathogenesis of a subset of colorectal cancers (CRCs) termed CIMP-high. EXPERIMENTAL

designThis phase I/II study in CRC (phase II portion restricted to CIMP-high CRC), treated fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin refractory patients with azacitidine (75 mg/m2/day subcutaneously D1-5) and CAPOX (capecitibine and oxaliplatin) every three weeks.

resultsTwenty-six patients (pts) were enrolled in this study: 15 pts (12 treated at MTD) in phase I and 11 pts in phase II. No dose limiting toxicities were observed. A total of 14 pts were CIMP-high. No responses were seen. CIMP-high status did not correlate with efficacy endpoints [stable disease (SD) or progression-free survival (PFS)] or baseline vimentin methylation level. Changes in vimentin methylation over time did not correlate with efficacy outcomes. Baseline methylated vimentin correlated with tumor volume (P<0.001) and higher levels of baseline methylation correlated with the obtainment of stable disease (P=0.04).

conclusionsAzacitidine and CAPOX were well tolerated with high rates of stable disease in CIMP-high pts, but no objective responses. Serum methylated vimentin may be associated with benefit from a regimen including a hypomethylation agent, although this study is not able to separate a potential prognostic or predictive role for the biomarker.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAzacitidineBiomarkers, TumorCapecitabineColorectal NeoplasmsCpG IslandsDisease-Free SurvivalDNA MethylationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrganoplatinum CompoundsAzacitidineBiomarkers, TumorCapecitabineOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinVimentinazacitidineCIMPcolorectal cancermethylationvimentin

Identifiers

PMID27542211
PMCPMC5341892
OpenAlexW2516762816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.