Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27541810›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2016

Anatomically-aided PET reconstruction using the kernel method.

Will Hutchcroft, Guobao Wang, Kevin T Chen, Ciprian Catana, Jinyi Qi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Deep Kernel Representation for Image Reconstruction in PET.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Modified kernel MLAA using autoencoder for PET-enabled dual-energy CT.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Improved identification of abdominal aortic aneurysm using the Kernelized Expectation Maximization algorithm.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Neural MLAA for PET-enabled Dual-Energy CT Imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Will HutchcroftDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Guobao WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Kevin T ChenDepartment of Radiology, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Ciprian CatanaDepartment of Radiology, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Jinyi QiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.

Funding

Optimization of PET ImagingR01EB000194 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI QI, JINYI · 2003 to 2018
$3.7M
MR-assisted PET data optimization for neuroimaging studiesR01EB014894 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CATANA, CIPRIAN · 2013 to 2016
$2.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000194NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper extends the kernel method that was proposed previously for dynamic PET reconstruction, to incorporate anatomical side information into the PET reconstruction model. In contrast to existing methods that incorporate anatomical information using a penalized likelihood framework, the proposed method incorporates this information in the simpler maximum likelihood (ML) formulation and is amenable to ordered subsets. The new method also does not require any segmentation of the anatomical image to obtain edge information. We compare the kernel method with the Bowsher method for anatomically-aided PET image reconstruction through a simulated data set. Computer simulations demonstrate that the kernel method offers advantages over the Bowsher method in region of interest quantification. Additionally the kernel method is applied to a 3D patient data set. The kernel method results in reduced noise at a matched contrast level compared with the conventional ML expectation maximization algorithm.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainBrain MappingComputer SimulationHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPositron-Emission TomographySoftware

Identifiers

PMID27541810
PMCPMC5095621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.