ReviewHealth economics review2016
Systematic review of health state utility values for economic evaluation of colorectal cancer.
Review in Health economics review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- PillCam COLON 2 for investigation of the colon through direct visualisation: systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for Colorectal Surgery: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2025Pooled it
- Health state utility values by cancer stage: a systematic literature review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic literature review of health state utility values in head and neck cancer.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2017Pooled it
- Five-year cost-effectiveness analysis of the European Fans in Training (EuroFIT) physical activity intervention for men versus no intervention.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020Trial
- A methodological analysis of systematic reviews of cost-effectiveness in screening, diagnosis, and treatment of colorectal cancer.Health economics review · 2026Review
- Article
- Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer with Chromosomal Instability: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for a Novel Precision Treatment Approach in Germany, Ireland and Spain.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Surveillance after Metastasectomy of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2023Article
- Cost-utility advantage of interventional endoscopy.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Image-guided navigation for locally advanced primary and locally recurrent rectal cancer: evaluation of its early cost-effectiveness.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Evaluating the conduct and application of health utility studies: a review of critical appraisal tools and reporting checklists.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021Review
- Differences in the Selection of Health State Utility Values by Sponsorship in Published Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021Article
- The Health-Related Quality of Life, Work Productivity, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Economic Burden Associated with Levels of Suicidal Ideation Among Patients Self-Reporting Moderately Severe or Severe Major Depressive Disorder in a National Survey.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2021Article
- Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Targeted Surgical and Endoscopic Therapies for Early Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Based on Biomarker Profiles.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life Among Colorectal Cancer Patients Using the Vietnamese Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L.Patient preference and adherence · 2020Article
- Molecular biomarkers and precision medicine in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of health economic analyses.Oncotarget · 2019Review
- Development and use of a content search strategy for retrieving studies on patients' views and preferences.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2017Article
- Estimating utility weights and quality-adjusted life year loss for colorectal cancer-related health states in Korea.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Health Utility Book (HUB)-Cancer: Protocol for a Systematic Literature Review of Health State Utility Values in Cancer.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cost-utility analyses undertaken to inform decision making regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) require a set of health state utility values (HSUVs) so that the time CRC patients spend in different health states can be aggregated into quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). This study reviews CRC-related HSUVs that could be used in economic evaluation and assesses their advantages and disadvantages with respect to valuation methods used and CRC clinical pathways. Fifty-seven potentially relevant studies were identified which collectively report 321 CRC-related HSUVs. HSUVs (even for similar health states) vary markedly and this adds to the uncertainty regarding estimates of cost-effectiveness. There are relatively few methodologically robust HSUVs that can be directly used in economic evaluations concerned with CRC. There is considerable scope to develop new HSUVs which improve on those currently available either by expanded collection of generic measures or by making greater use of condition-specific data, for example, using mapping algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.