Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27540849›Full record

ArticleJAMA psychiatry2016

Antipsychotic Use in Pregnancy and the Risk for Congenital Malformations.

Krista F Huybrechts, Sonia Hernández-Díaz, Elisabetta Patorno, Rishi J Desai, Helen Mogun, Sara Z Dejene, Jacqueline M Cohen, Alice Panchaud, Lee Cohen, Brian T Bateman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
30.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 281 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Review: Antipsychotic Medication in Pregnancy and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Children.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Krista F HuybrechtsDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sonia Hernández-DíazDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elisabetta PatornoDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rishi J DesaiDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Helen MogunDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sara Z DejeneDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jacqueline M CohenDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alice PanchaudDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lee CohenCenter for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Brian T BatemanDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts4Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Comparative Safety of commonly prescribed Psychotropic Drugs in pregnant WomenR01MH100216 · NIMH · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HERNANDEZ-DIAZ, SONIA · 2014 to 2016
$1.4M
Improved methods to assess the comparative safety of new psychiatric medicationsK01MH099141 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HUYBRECHTS, KRISTA F · 2013 to 2017
$882k
Comparative safety & effectiveness of antihypertensive medications in pregnancyK08HD075831 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BATEMAN, BRIAN THOMAS · 2013 to 2017
$717k
NICHD NIH HHS K08 HD075831NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH099141NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe frequency of antipsychotic (AP) use during pregnancy has approximately doubled during the last decade. However, little is known about their safety for the developing fetus, and concerns have been raised about a potential association with congenital malformations.

objectiveTo examine the risk for congenital malformations overall and cardiac malformations associated with first-trimester exposure to APs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis nationwide sample of 1 360 101 pregnant women enrolled in Medicaid with a live-born infant constituted the pregnancy cohort nested in the Medicaid Analytic Extract database, which included data from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2010. Participants were enrolled in Medicaid from 3 months before their last menstrual period through at least 1 month after delivery. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated using generalized linear models with fine stratification on the propensity score to control for the underlying psychiatric disorders and other potential confounders. Data were analyzed during 2015. EXPOSURES: Use of APs during the first trimester, the etiologically relevant period for organogenesis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Major congenital malformations overall and cardiac malformations identified during the first 90 days after delivery.

resultsOf the 1 341 715 pregnancies that met inclusion criteria (mean [SD] age of women, 24.02 [5.77] years), 9258 (0.69%) filled at least 1 prescription for an atypical AP and 733 (0.05%) filled at least 1 prescription for a typical AP during the first trimester. Overall, 32.7 (95% CI, 32.4-33.0) per 1000 births not exposed to APs were diagnosed with congenital malformations compared with 44.5 (95% CI, 40.5-48.9) per 1000 births exposed to atypical and 38.2 (95% CI, 26.6-54.7) per 1000 births exposed to typical APs. Unadjusted analyses suggested an increased risk for malformations overall for atypical APs (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.24-1.50) but not for typical APs (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.81-1.68). After confounding adjustment, the RR was reduced to 1.05 (95% CI, 0.96-1.16) for atypical APs and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.62-1.31) for typical APs. The findings for cardiac malformations were similar. For the individual agents examined, a small increased risk in overall malformations (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.02-1.56) and cardiac malformations (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.88-1.81) was found for risperidone that was independent of measured confounders. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Evidence from this large study suggests that use of APs early in pregnancy generally does not meaningfully increase the risk for congenital malformations overall or cardiac malformations in particular. The small increase in the risk for malformations observed with risperidone requires additional study.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAdultAntipsychotic AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfant, NewbornMedicaidPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy Trimester, FirstPsychotic DisordersRiskRisperidoneUnited StatesAntipsychotic AgentsRisperidone

Identifiers

PMID27540849
PMCPMC5321163
OpenAlexW2512939136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.