Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27540766›Full record

ArticleAutophagy2016

Comparative analyses of ubiquitin-like ATG8 and cysteine protease ATG4 autophagy genes in the plant lineage and cross-kingdom processing of ATG8 by ATG4.

Eunyoung Seo, Jongchan Woo, Eunsook Park, Steven J Bertolani, Justin B Siegel, Doil Choi, Savithramma P Dinesh-Kumar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Autophagy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Autophagy in Plant Abiotic Stress Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eunyoung Seoa Department of Plant Biology and the Genome Center , College of Biological Sciences, University of California , Davis , CA USA.
Jongchan Wooa Department of Plant Biology and the Genome Center , College of Biological Sciences, University of California , Davis , CA USA.
Eunsook Parka Department of Plant Biology and the Genome Center , College of Biological Sciences, University of California , Davis , CA USA.
Steven J Bertolanic Department of Chemistry and the Genome Center , University of California , Davis , CA USA.
Justin B Siegelc Department of Chemistry and the Genome Center , University of California , Davis , CA USA.
Doil Choib Department of Plant Science , Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University , Korea.
Savithramma P Dinesh-Kumara Department of Plant Biology and the Genome Center , College of Biological Sciences, University of California , Davis , CA USA.
University of California, Davis · USSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is important for degradation and recycling of intracellular components. In a diversity of genera and species, orthologs and paralogs of the yeast Atg4 and Atg8 proteins are crucial in the biogenesis of double-membrane autophagosomes that carry the cellular cargoes to vacuoles and lysosomes. Although many plant genome sequences are available, the ATG4 and ATG8 sequence analysis is limited to some model plants. We identified 28 ATG4 and 116 ATG8 genes from the available 18 different plant genome sequences. Gene structures and protein domain sequences of ATG4 and ATG8 are conserved in plant lineages. Phylogenetic analyses classified ATG8s into 3 subgroups suggesting divergence from the common ancestor. The ATG8 expansion in plants might be attributed to whole genome duplication, segmental and dispersed duplication, and purifying selection. Our results revealed that the yeast Atg4 processes Arabidopsis ATG8 but not human LC3A (HsLC3A). In contrast, HsATG4B can process yeast and plant ATG8s in vitro but yeast and plant ATG4s cannot process HsLC3A. Interestingly, in Nicotiana benthamiana plants the yeast Atg8 is processed compared to HsLC3A. However, HsLC3A is processed when coexpressed with HsATG4B in plants. Molecular modeling indicates that lack of processing of HsLC3A by plant and yeast ATG4 is not due to lack of interaction with HsLC3A. Our in-depth analyses of ATG4 and ATG8 in the plant lineage combined with results of cross-kingdom ATG8 processing by ATG4 further support the evolutionarily conserved maturation of ATG8. Broad ATG8 processing by HsATG4B and lack of processing of HsLC3A by yeast and plant ATG4s suggest that the cross-kingdom ATG8 processing is determined by ATG8 sequence rather than ATG4.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAmino Acid SequenceAutophagyAutophagy-Related Protein 8 FamilyAutophagy-Related ProteinsCysteine ProteasesGene DuplicationGenes, PlantHumansMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNicotianaPlant ProteinsPlantsProtein BindingProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAutophagy-Related Protein 8 FamilyAutophagy-Related ProteinsCysteine ProteasesMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsPlant ProteinsUbiquitinArabidopsisATG4ATG8autophagosomesautophagyhomology modelinghumanLC3Atomatoyeast

Identifiers

PMID27540766
PMCPMC5103345
OpenAlexW2518558834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.