Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27540488›Full record

ArticleJRSM open2016

How to monitor patient safety in primary care? Healthcare professionals' views.

R Samra, J Car, A Majeed, C Vincent, P Aylin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JRSM open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Final-year medical students' reflections on types of significant events in primary care.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R SamraDepartment of Health and Social Care, Faculty of Health and Social Care, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA.
J CarDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 6RP; LKCMedicine, Imperial College London-Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798.
A MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 6RP.
C VincentDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD.
P AylinDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 6RP.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify patient safety monitoring strategies in primary care.

designOpen-ended questionnaire survey.

participantsA total of 113 healthcare professionals returned the survey from a group of 500 who were invited to participate achieving a response rate of 22.6%.

settingNorth-West London, United Kingdom.

methodA paper-based and equivalent online survey was developed and subjected to multiple stages of piloting. Respondents were asked to suggest strategies for monitoring patient safety in primary care. These monitoring suggestions were then subjected to a content frequency analysis which was conducted by two researchers.

main outcome measuresRespondent-derived monitoring strategies.

resultsIn total, respondents offered 188 suggestions for monitoring patient safety in primary care. The content analysis revealed that these could be condensed into 24 different future monitoring strategies with varying levels of support. Most commonly, respondents supported the suggestion that patient safety can only be monitored effectively in primary care with greater levels of staffing or with additional resources.

conclusionApproximately one-third of all responses were recommendations for strategies which addressed monitoring of the individual in the clinical practice environment (e.g. GP, practice nurse) to improve safety. There was a clear need for more staff and resource set aside to allow and encourage safety monitoring. Respondents recommended the dissemination of specific information for monitoring patient safety such as distributing the lessons of significant event audits amongst GP practices to enable shared learning.

Indexed as

attitudespatient safetyprimary care physiciansquestionnaire methods

Identifiers

PMID27540488
PMCPMC4973401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.