Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27540391›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

CsAP3: A Cucumber Homolog to Arabidopsis APETALA3 with Novel Characteristics.

Jin-Jing Sun, Feng Li, Dong-Hui Wang, Xiao-Feng Liu, Xia Li, Na Liu, Hai-Tao Gu, Cheng Zou, Jing-Chu Luo, Chao-Xing He and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The MADS-Box GeneFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Differential Gene Expression Caused by theFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jin-Jing SunState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene ResearchBeijing, China; Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijing, China; College of Life Sciences, Peking UniversityBeijing, China.
Feng LiState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene ResearchBeijing, China; College of Life Sciences, Peking UniversityBeijing, China.
Dong-Hui WangState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene ResearchBeijing, China; College of Life Sciences, Peking UniversityBeijing, China.
Xiao-Feng LiuDepartment of Vegetable Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Growth and Developmental Regulation for Protected Vegetable Crops, China Agricultural University Beijing, China.
Xia LiCollege of Life Sciences, Peking University Beijing, China.
Na LiuState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene ResearchBeijing, China; College of Life Sciences, Peking UniversityBeijing, China.
Hai-Tao GuState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene ResearchBeijing, China; College of Life Sciences, Peking UniversityBeijing, China.
Cheng ZouState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene ResearchBeijing, China; College of Life Sciences, Peking UniversityBeijing, China.
Jing-Chu LuoCollege of Life Sciences, Peking University Beijing, China.
Chao-Xing HeInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing, China.
San-Wen HuangInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing, China.
Xiao-Lan ZhangDepartment of Vegetable Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Growth and Developmental Regulation for Protected Vegetable Crops, China Agricultural University Beijing, China.
Zhi-Hong XuState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene ResearchBeijing, China; College of Life Sciences, Peking UniversityBeijing, China.
Shu-Nong BaiState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene ResearchBeijing, China; College of Life Sciences, Peking UniversityBeijing, China; National Center of Plant Gene ResearchBeijing, China.
State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics · CNPeking University · CNState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene ResearchChina Agricultural University · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our previous efforts to understand the regulatory mechanisms of cucumber unisexual flower development, we observed a stamen-specific down-regulation of the ethylene receptor CsETR1 in stage 6 female flowers of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). This down-regulation is correlated with the primordial anther-specific DNA damage that characterizes inappropriate stamen development in cucumber female flowers. To understand how CsETR1 is down regulated in the stamen, we characterized a cucumber MADS box gene homologous to Arabidopsis AP3, CsAP3. We demonstrated that CsAP3 is functionally equivalent to the Arabidopsis B-class MADS gene AP3. However, three novel characteristics of CsAP3 were found. These include firstly, binding and activating CsETR1 promoter in vitro and in vivo; secondly, containing a GV repeat in its C-terminus, which is conserved in cucurbits and required for the transcription activation; and thirdly, decreased expression as the node number increases, which is similar to that found for CsETR1. These findings revealed not only the conserved function of CsAP3 as a B-class floral identity gene, but also its unique functions in regulation of female flower development in cucumber.

Indexed as

cucumberethyleneMADS box genesstamen arrestmentunisexual flower development

Identifiers

PMID27540391
PMCPMC4972961
OpenAlexW2492541158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.