Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27540110›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2016

Clinical Impact and Cost-effectiveness of Diagnosing HIV Infection During Early Infancy in South Africa: Test Timing and Frequency.

Jordan A Francke, Martina Penazzato, Taige Hou, Elaine J Abrams, Rachel L MacLean, Landon Myer, Rochelle P Walensky, Valériane Leroy, Milton C Weinstein, Robert A Parker and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jordan A FranckeDivision of General Internal Medicine.
Martina PenazzatoMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit London, United Kingdom.
Taige HouDivision of General Internal Medicine.
Elaine J AbramsInternational Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Program, Mailman School of Public Health.
Rachel L MacLeanDivision of General Internal Medicine.
Landon MyerDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Rochelle P WalenskyDivision of General Internal Medicine.
Valériane LeroyInserm U1027, University of Toulouse 3, France.
Milton C WeinsteinDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.
Robert A ParkerDivision of General Internal Medicine.
Kenneth A FreedbergDivision of General Internal Medicine.
Andrea CiaranelloMedical Practice Evaluation Center.

Funding

LOC-IMPAACT Leadership GroupPharmacokinetics and Safety of Remdesivir for Treatment of COVID-19 in Pregnant Women in the USUM1AI068632 · NIAID · SOCIAL AND SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS, INC. · PI Jennifer Jao, Sharon A Nachman · 2011 to 2026
$278.1M
Statistical and Data Management Center-Pediatric,Adolescent, and Maternal CTGUM1AI068616 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Sean Scott Brummel, Marlene Ann Cooper · 2011 to 2026
$155.6M
Optimizing HIV Care in Less Developed CountriesR01AI058736 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Kenneth Alan Freedberg, Emily Parker Hyle · 2004 to 2026
$21.5M
Innovation across the spectrum of pediatric HIV care: Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of long-acting antiretroviral therapy for breastfeeding people with HIV and their infants in ZimbabweR01HD079214 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CIARANELLO, ANDREA LYNNE · 2014 to 2023
$8.0M
Novel Methods to Inform HIV/TB Clinical Trial DevelopmentR01AI093269 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI REDDY, KRISHNA P · 2011 to 2024
$6.8M
Novel Methods to Inform HIV/TB Clinical Trial DevelopmentR37AI093269 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WALENSKY, ROCHELLE P. · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
Optimizing Outcomes for HIV-Exposed and HIV-Infected Children in South AfricaK01AI078754 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CIARANELLO, ANDREA LYNNE · 2009 to 2013
$685k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI078754NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI058736NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093269NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI093269NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068616NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068632NICHD NIH HHS HHSN267200800001CNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079214NIDDK NIH HHS HHSN267200800001GWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection during early infancy (commonly known as "early infant HIV diagnosis" [EID]) followed by prompt initiation of antiretroviral therapy dramatically reduces mortality. EID testing is recommended at 6 weeks of age, but many infant infections are missed. DESIGN/

methodsWe simulated 4 EID testing strategies for HIV-exposed infants in South Africa: no EID (diagnosis only after illness; hereafter, "no EID"), testing once (at birth alone or at 6 weeks of age alone; hereafter, "birth alone" and "6 weeks alone," respectively), and testing twice (at birth and 6 weeks of age; hereafter "birth and 6 weeks"). We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), using discounted costs and life expectancies for all HIV-exposed (infected and uninfected) infants.

resultsIn the base case (guideline-concordant care), the no EID strategy produced a life expectancy of 21.1 years (in the HIV-infected group) and 61.1 years (in the HIV-exposed group); lifetime cost averaged $1430/HIV-exposed infant. The birth and 6 weeks strategy maximized life expectancy (26.5 years in the HIV-infected group and 61.4 years in the HIV-exposed group), costing $1840/infant tested. The ICER of the 6 weeks alone strategy versus the no EID strategy was $1250/year of life saved (19% of South Africa's per capita gross domestic product); the ICER for the birth and 6 weeks strategy versus the 6 weeks alone strategy was $2900/year of life saved (45% of South Africa's per capita gross domestic product). Increasing the proportion of caregivers who receive test results and the linkage of HIV-positive infants to antiretroviral therapy with the 6 weeks alone strategy improved survival more than adding a second test.

conclusionsEID at birth and 6 weeks improves outcomes and is cost-effective, compared with EID at 6 weeks alone. If scale-up costs are comparable, programs should add birth testing after strengthening 6-week testing programs.

Indexed as

AdultCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly DiagnosisFemaleHealth Care CostsHIV InfectionsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedSouth AfricaYoung Adultbirth testingcost-effectivenessearly infant HIV diagnosishuman immunodeficiency virusnucleic acid test

Identifiers

PMID27540110
PMCPMC5079370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.