Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27540097›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Impact of holding the baby following stillbirth on maternal mental health and well-being: findings from a national survey.

Maggie Redshaw, Julie M Hennegan, Jane Henderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Functional status of women with and without potentially life-threatening maternal conditions after 6 months postpartum: A cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Holding a baby after stillbirth: the impact of fetal congenital and structural abnormalities.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maggie RedshawPolicy Research Unit in Maternal Health & Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Julie M HenneganPolicy Research Unit in Maternal Health & Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jane HendersonPolicy Research Unit in Maternal Health & Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare mental health and well-being outcomes at 3 and 9 months after the stillbirth among women who held or did not hold their baby, adjusting for demographic and clinical differences.

designSecondary analyses of data from a postal population survey. POPULATION: Women with a registered stillbirth in England in 2012.

methods468 eligible responses were compared. Differences in demographic, clinical and care characteristics between those who held or did not hold their infant were described and adjusted for in subsequent analysis. Mental health and well-being outcomes were compared, and subgroup comparisons tested hypothesised moderating factors. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and relationship difficulties.

resultsThere was a 30.2% response rate to the survey. Most women saw (97%, n=434) and held (84%, n=394) their baby after stillbirth. There were some demographic differences with migrant women, women who had a multiple birth and those whose pregnancy resulted from fertility treatment being less likely to hold their baby. Women who held their stillborn baby consistently reported higher rates of mental health and relationship difficulties. After adjustment, women who held their baby had 2.12 times higher odds (95% CI 1.11 to 4.04) of reporting anxiety at 9 months and 5.33 times higher odds (95% CI 1.26 to 22.53) of reporting relationship difficulties with family. Some evidence for proposed moderators was observed with poorer mental health reported by women who had held a stillborn baby of <33 weeks' gestation, and those pregnant at outcome assessment.

conclusionsThis study supports concern about the negative impact of holding the infant after stillbirth. Results are limited by the observational nature of the study, survey response rate and inability to adjust for women's baseline anxiety. Findings add important evidence to a mixed body of literature.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionEnglandFamily ConflictFemaleGestational AgeHealth SurveysHumansInfant, NewbornMother-Child RelationsMothersPostpartum PeriodPregnancybereavementcare practiceholdinfant contactstillbirthtouch

Identifiers

PMID27540097
PMCPMC5013511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.