Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27539864›Full record

SynthesisSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2017

The role of language in the experience and perception of emotion: a neuroimaging meta-analysis.

Jeffrey A Brooks, Holly Shablack, Maria Gendron, Ajay B Satpute, Michael H Parrish, Kristen A Lindquist

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neural Representations of Concreteness and Concrete Concepts Are Specific to the Individual.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeffrey A BrooksDepartment of Psychology, New York University.
Holly ShablackDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Maria GendronDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University.
Ajay B SatputeDepartment of Psychology, Pomona College.
Michael H ParrishDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Kristen A LindquistDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

Basic mechanisms of cultural relativity in emotion perceptionF32MH105052 · NIMH · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI GENDRON, MARIA THERESE · 2015 to 2017
$183k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH105052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies demonstrate that labeling one's emotional experiences and perceptions alters those states. Here, we used a comprehensive meta-analysis of the neuroimaging literature to systematically explore whether the presence of emotion words in experimental tasks has an impact on the neural representation of emotional experiences and perceptions across studies. Using a database of 386 studies, we assessed brain activity when emotion words (e.g. 'anger', 'disgust') and more general affect words (e.g. 'pleasant', 'unpleasant') were present in experimental tasks vs not present. As predicted, when emotion words were present, we observed more frequent activations in regions related to semantic processing. When emotion words were not present, we observed more frequent activations in the amygdala and parahippocampal gyrus, bilaterally. The presence of affect words did not have the same effect on the neural representation of emotional experiences and perceptions, suggesting that our observed effects are specific to emotion words. These findings are consistent with the psychological constructionist prediction that in the absence of accessible emotion concepts, the meaning of affective experiences and perceptions are ambiguous. Findings are also consistent with the regulatory role of 'affect labeling'. Implications of the role of language in emotion construction and regulation are discussed.

Indexed as

LanguageNeuroimagingSemanticsAmygdalaBrainConcept FormationDominance, CerebralEmotionsHumansParahippocampal GyrusSpeech Perceptionconceptsemotionlanguagemeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID27539864
PMCPMC5390741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.