Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2017
Open Flow Microperfusion as a Dermal Pharmacokinetic Approach to Evaluate Topical Bioequivalence.
Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Exploratory Pilot Study in Healthy Volunteers to Assess the Parameters for the Design of Bioequivalence Studies on Moderately Lipophilic, Moderately to Highly Protein Bound Drugs Using Dermal Open Flow Microperfusion (dOFM)
An Exploratory Study in Healthy Volunteers to Investigate the Cross-talk Between Local Drug Concentrations in the Skin and Systemic Concentrations During Topical Bioequivalence Studies Using Dermal Sampling Techniques
An Exploratory Study in Healthy Volunteers to Identify Factors Influencing Bioequivalence Studies on Moderately Lipophilic Drugs Using Dermal Open Flow Microperfusion (dOFM)
A Single Center, Open-label, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Ability of Dermal Open Flow Microperfusion (dOFM) for Bioequivalence Testing of Topically Applied Diclofenac Sodium Products in Healthy Subjects
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Drug Delivery Kinetics to Epidermal Targets In Vivo.The AAPS journal · 2021Trial
- Pharmacokinetic Relevance of In Vitro Skin Models: Absorption, Cutaneous Distribution, Metabolism, and Clearance-like Removal in Dermal and Transdermal Drug Testing.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Cutaneous pharmacokinetics of a volatile drug post-application to the skin.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Ropivacaine-based Regional Anesthesia Exerts Muscle-protective Effects Despite Elevated Compartment Pressure in a Porcine Model of Acute Compartment Syndrome.Anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Adaptive optics stimulated Raman scattering microscopy for topical product pharmacokinetic imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- From Lab to Workplace: Efficacy of Skin Protection Creams Against Hydrophobic Working Materials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Enhanced extraction of human interstitial fluid using microneedles and laser-induced fluid recruitment.iScience · 2025Article
- Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: Methods for Enhancing Skin Permeability and Their Evaluation.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Bridging Blood and Skin: Biomarker Profiling in Dermal Interstitial Fluid (dISF) for Minimally Invasive Diagnostics.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Open flow microperfusion to assess local drug concentrations in the buccal mucosa.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Article
- Tackling cutaneous herpes simplex virus disease with topical immunomodulators-a call to action.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Ex Vivo Human Skin Model to Study Immediate and Early Local Responses to External Stimuli.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Effect of "In Use" Administration on Topical Product Metamorphosis and Skin Permeation of Acyclovir Creams: Implications for Bioequivalence.Pharmaceutical research · 2024Article
- Comparative Study of Dermal Pharmacokinetics Between Topical Drugs Using Open Flow Microperfusion in a Pig Model.Pharmaceutical research · 2024Article
- Design and fabrication of customizable microneedles enabled by 3D printing for biomedical applications.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Update on the advances and challenges in bioequivalence testing methods for complex topical generic products.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Reverse Iontophoresis: Noninvasive Assessment of Topical Drug Bioavailability.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Role of the interstitium during septic shock: a key to the understanding of fluid dynamics?Journal of intensive care · 2023Review
- Bioequivalence Evaluation of Topical Metronidazole Products Using Dermal Microdialysis in New Zealand Rabbits.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2023Article
- Quantification of Chemical Uptake into the Skin by Vibrational Spectroscopies and Stratum Corneum Sampling.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe availability of generic topical dermatological drug products is constrained by the limited methods established to assess topical bioequivalence (BE). A novel cutaneous pharmacokinetic approach, dermal open-flow microperfusion (dOFM), can continuously assess the rate and extent to which a topical drug becomes available in the dermis, to compare in vivo dermal bioavailability (BA) and support BE evaluations for topical products.
objectiveTo evaluate whether dOFM is an accurate, sensitive, and reproducible in vivo method to characterize the intradermal BA of acyclovir from 5 % acyclovir creams, comparing a reference (R) product either to itself or to a different test (T) product.
methodsIn a single-center clinical study, R or T products were applied to six randomized treatment sites on the skin of 20 healthy human subjects. Two dOFM probes were inserted in each treatment site to monitor the intradermal acyclovir concentration for 36 h. Comparative BA (of R vs. R and T vs. R) was evaluated based on conventional BE criteria for pharmacokinetic endpoints (area under the curve and maximum dermal concentration) where the 90 % confidence interval of the geometric mean ratio between the T and R falls within 0.80-1.25.
resultsThe positive control products (R vs. R) were accurately and reproducibly confirmed to be bioequivalent, while the negative control products (T vs. R) were sensitively discriminated not to be bioequivalent.
conclusionsdOFM accurately, sensitively, and reproducibly characterized the dermal BA in a manner that can support BE evaluations for topical acyclovir 5 % creams in a study with n = 40 (20 subjects in this study).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.